Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17855657›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2007

Breast cancer molecular signatures as determined by SAGE: correlation with lymph node status.

Martín C Abba, Hongxia Sun, Kathleen A Hawkins, Jeffrey A Drake, Yuhui Hu, Maria I Nunez, Sally Gaddis, Tao Shi, Steve Horvath, Aysegul Sahin and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MDiscover oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. The expression ofAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Role of HOXC10 in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of the DEK oncogene in the development of squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martín C AbbaDepartment of Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park-Research Division, P.O. Box 389, Smithville, TX 78957, USA.
Hongxia Sun
Kathleen A Hawkins
Jeffrey A Drake
Yuhui Hu
Maria I Nunez
Sally Gaddis
Tao Shi
Steve Horvath
Aysegul Sahin
C Marcelo Aldaz
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USOrtho Clinical Diagnostics (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES007784 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RICHIE, ELLEN R · 1996 to 2011
$16.4M
High resolution transcriptome analysis: lnn breast cancerU19CA084978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ALDAZ, C. MARCELO · 2001 to 2004
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1U19 CA84978-1A1NCI NIH HHS U19 CA084978NIEHS NIH HHS ES-07784NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global gene expression measured by DNA microarray platforms have been extensively used to classify breast carcinomas correlating with clinical characteristics, including outcome. We generated a breast cancer Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) high-resolution database of approximately 2.7 million tags to perform unsupervised statistical analyses to obtain the molecular classification of breast-invasive ductal carcinomas in correlation with clinicopathologic features. Unsupervised statistical analysis by means of a random forest approach identified two main clusters of breast carcinomas, which differed in their lymph node status (P=0.01); this suggested that lymph node status leads to globally distinct expression profiles. A total of 245 (55 up-modulated and 190 down-modulated) transcripts were differentially expressed between lymph node (+) and lymph node (-) primary breast tumors (fold change, >or=2; P<0.05). Various lymph node (+) up-modulated transcripts were validated in independent sets of human breast tumors by means of real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). We validated significant overexpression of transcripts for HOXC10 (P=0.001), TPD52L1 (P=0.007), ZFP36L1 (P=0.011), PLINP1 (P=0.013), DCTN3 (P=0.025), DEK (P=0.031), and CSNK1D (P=0.04) in lymph node (+) breast carcinomas. Moreover, the DCTN3 (P=0.022) and RHBDD2 (P=0.002) transcripts were confirmed to be overexpressed in tumors that recurred within 6 years of follow-up by real-time RT-PCR. In addition, meta-analysis was used to compare SAGE data associated with lymph node (+) status with publicly available breast cancer DNA microarray data sets. We have generated evidence indicating that the pattern of gene expression in primary breast cancers at the time of surgical removal could discriminate those tumors with lymph node metastatic involvement using SAGE to identify specific transcripts that behave as predictors of recurrence as well.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDNA PrimersFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscription, GeneticDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID17855657
PMCPMC4186709
OpenAlexW2136931128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.