Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17854955›Full record

ArticleVaccine2007

Live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes expressing HIV Gag: immunogenicity in rhesus monkeys.

Shisong Jiang, Robert A Rasmussen, Katrina M Nolan, Fred R Frankel, Judy Lieberman, Harold M McClure, Kristina M Williams, Uma S Babu, Richard B Raybourne, Elizabeth Strobert and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. AttenuatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Live bacterial vaccine vectors: an overview.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shisong JiangDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Robert A Rasmussen
Katrina M Nolan
Fred R Frankel
Judy Lieberman
Harold M McClure
Kristina M Williams
Uma S Babu
Richard B Raybourne
Elizabeth Strobert
Ruth M Ruprecht
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USHarvard University · US

Funding

YNPRC NHP CLINICAL MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM - SUPPLEMENTP51RR000165 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNS, MICHAEL M · 1985 to 2011
$114.0M
Vaccine Production CoreP01AI054558 · NIAID · IMMUNE DISEASE INSTITUTE, INC. · PI FRANKEL, FRED ROBERT · 2003 to 2009
$8.3M
Attenuated recombinant Listeria as oral AIDS vaccineR21AI054183 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI RUPRECHT, RUTH MARGRIT · 2003 to 2003
$497k
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000165NCRR NIH HHS RR-00165NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI054558NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI054183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of strong cellular immunity will be important for AIDS vaccine candidates. Natural infection with wild-type Listeria monocytogenes (Lm), an orally transmitted organism, is known to generate strong cellular immunity, thus raising the possibility that live attenuated Lm could serve as a vaccine vector. We sought to examine the potential of live attenuated Lm to induce cellular immune responses to HIV Gag. Rhesus macaques were immunized with Lmdd-gag that expresses HIV gag and lacks two genes in the D-alanine (D-ala) synthesis pathway. Without this key component of the bacterial cell wall, vaccine vector replication critically depends on exogenous D-ala. Lmdd-gag was given to animals either solely orally or by oral priming followed by intramuscular (i.m.) boosting; D-ala was co-administered with all vaccinations. Lmdd-gag and D-ala were well tolerated. Oral priming/oral boosting induced Gag-specific cellular immune responses, whereas oral priming/i.m. boosting induced systemic as well as mucosal anti-Gag antibodies. These results suggest that the route of vaccination may bias anti-Gag immune responses either towards T-helper type 1 (Th1) or Th2 responses; overall, our data show that live attenuated, recombinant Lmdd-gag is safe and immunogenic in primates.

Indexed as

Genes, gagAdministration, OralAIDS VaccinesAnimalsgag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusGene DeletionGenes, BacterialHIV AntibodiesImmunity, CellularImmunity, MucosalImmunization, SecondaryInjections, IntramuscularListeria monocytogenesLymphocyte ActivationMacaca mulattaSafetyAIDS Vaccinesgag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusHIV AntibodiesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID17854955
PMCPMC2518091
OpenAlexW2030643198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.