Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17854507›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2007

An action research protocol to strengthen system-wide inter-professional learning and practice [LP0775514].

Jeffrey Braithwaite, Johanna I Westbrook, A Ruth Foxwell, Rosalie Boyce, Timothy Devinney, Marc Budge, Karen Murphy, Mary-Ann Ryall, Jenny Beutel, Rebecca Vanderheide and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The implementation of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: the Australian experience.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  6. Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jeffrey BraithwaiteCentre for Clinical Governance Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, 10 Arthur St, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia. j.braithwaite@unsw.edu.au
Johanna I Westbrook
A Ruth Foxwell
Rosalie Boyce
Timothy Devinney
Marc Budge
Karen Murphy
Mary-Ann Ryall
Jenny Beutel
Rebecca Vanderheide
Elizabeth Renton
Joanne Travaglia
Judy Stone
Amanda Barnard
David Greenfield
Angus Corbett
Peter Nugus
Robyn Clay-Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInter-professional learning (IPL) and inter-professional practice (IPP) are thought to be critical determinants of effective care, improved quality and safety and enhanced provider morale, yet few empirical studies have demonstrated this. Whole-of-system research is even less prevalent. We aim to provide a four year, multi-method, multi-collaborator action research program of IPL and IPP in defined, bounded health and education systems located in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The project is funded by the Australian Research Council under its industry Linkage Program. METHODS/

designThe program of research will examine in four inter-related, prospective studies, progress with IPL and IPP across tertiary education providers, professional education, regulatory and registration bodies, the ACT health system's streams of care activities and teams, units and wards of the provider facilities of the ACT health system. One key focus will be on push-pull mechanisms, ie, how the education sector creates student-enabled IPP and the health sector demands IPL-oriented practitioners. The studies will examine four research aims and meet 20 research project objectives in a comprehensive evaluation of ongoing progress with IPL and IPP. DISCUSSION: IPP and IPL are said to be cornerstones of health system reforms. We will measure progress across an entire health system and the clinical and professional education systems that feed into it. The value of multi-methods, partnership research and a bi-directional push-pull model of IPL and IPP will be tested. Widespread dissemination of results to practitioners, policymakers, managers and researchers will be a key project goal.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsLearningModels, EducationalAcademic Medical CentersAustralian Capital TerritoryCooperative BehaviorEducation, Public Health ProfessionalHealth Care ReformHealth Services ResearchHumansPilot ProjectsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationPublic Health AdministrationSystems Integration

Identifiers

PMID17854507
PMCPMC2212639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.