Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17850653›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007

Integrating sequence and structural biology with DAS.

Andreas Prlić, Thomas A Down, Eugene Kulesha, Robert D Finn, Andreas Kähäri, Tim J P Hubbard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Protein Model Portal--a comprehensive resource for protein structure and model information.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013
    Article
  15. Accessing data from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: state of the art and future plans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Meet me halfway: when genomics meets structural bioinformatics.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreas PrlićThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. ap3@sanger.ac.uk
Thomas A Down
Eugene Kulesha
Robert D Finn
Andreas Kähäri
Tim J P Hubbard

Funding

Wellcome Trust 062023Wellcome Trust 077198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Distributed Annotation System (DAS) is a network protocol for exchanging biological data. It is frequently used to share annotations of genomes and protein sequence.

resultsHere we present several extensions to the current DAS 1.5 protocol. These provide new commands to share alignments, three dimensional molecular structure data, add the possibility for registration and discovery of DAS servers, and provide a convention how to provide different types of data plots. We present examples of web sites and applications that use the new extensions. We operate a public registry of DAS sources, which now includes entries for more than 250 distinct sources.

conclusionOur DAS extensions are essential for the management of the growing number of services and exchange of diverse biological data sets. In addition the extensions allow new types of applications to be developed and scientific questions to be addressed. The registry of DAS sources is available at http://www.dasregistry.org.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, GeneticInternetUser-Computer InterfaceAlgorithmsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyInformation Storage and RetrievalSequence AnalysisSystems Integration

Identifiers

PMID17850653
PMCPMC2031907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.