ReviewCNS drugs2007
Subcutaneous interferon-beta-1a : new formulation.
Review in CNS drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twenty Years of Subcutaneous Interferon-Beta-1a for Multiple Sclerosis: Contemporary Perspectives.Neurology and therapy · 2024Review
- Review
- Improving compliance with interferon-beta therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new formulation of subcutaneous interferon-beta-1a was developed without serum-derived components with the aim of improving immunogenicity and injection tolerability in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). In a prospectively defined interim analysis at 48 weeks of an ongoing, single-arm, phase IIIb trial, 13.9% of MS patients receiving the new formulation of subcutaneous interferon-beta-1a 44 microg three times weekly had developed neutralising antibodies (NAbs). In the EVIDENCE trial, which served as an historical control, 24.4% of patients receiving the same dosage of the current formulation had developed NAbs at 48 weeks. The new formulation demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic activity to that of the current formulation in a phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. About two-thirds of patients with MS who received the new formulation of subcutaneous interferon-beta-1a were relapse free in the interim, 48-week analysis of the single-arm trial; this is similar to results for the current formulation from historical data. A comparison of results from the interim, 48-week analysis with historical-control data from the EVIDENCE trial indicates that the new formulation of interferon-beta-1a may be associated with a lower incidence of injection-site reactions and a higher incidence of influenza-like symptoms than the current formulation. Adverse events associated with the new formulation were mostly mild to moderate in severity
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.