ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2008
Quantification of atherosclerotic coronary plaque components by submillimeter computed tomography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Changing views of the biomechanics of vulnerable plaque rupture: a review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2014Review
- Computed tomography for detection of vulnerable coronary plaque - A Cassandra's dream?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2014Article
- Detection of coronary artery disease by free-breathing, whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: our initial experience.Heart and vessels · 2009Article
- Vulnerable plaque imaging-current techniques.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2009Review
- Quantitative plaque characterization with coronary CT angiography (CTA): current challenges and future application in atherosclerosis trials and clinical risk assessment.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2008Article
- Coronary arterial atherosclerotic plaque imaging by contrast-enhanced computed tomography: fantasy or reality?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear CardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several investigations have shown that multi-detecor row computed tomography (MDCT) of the coronary arteries can detect noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque, it has remained unresolved if the method also determines features of a rupture-prone plaque. We set out to correlate the size of atherosclerotic plaque components with cardiac MDCT with histology. METHODS AND
resultsIn 30 autopsy cases, hearts were isolated, coronary arteries filled with contrast agent, and depicted with a clinical 16-row detector CT with a slice thickness of 0.63 mm. Transections of the three main coronary arteries were reconstructed and compared with histopathologic sections using light microscopy. MDCT measurements of total plaque area (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001) and calcified plaque area (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) correlated well with histopathology, while measurements of non-calcified plaque area (r = 0.53, P < 0.0001) and lipid core size (r = 0.43; P < 0.0001) correlated less well. MDCT overestimated all plaque areas except lipid core size, which was underestimated.
conclusionsCoronary CT provides an accurate and reproducible method for the quantitative assessment of total plaque and calcified plaque areas. However, the method is less accurate for the quantification of non-calcified plaque area and lipid core size, which is ascribed to limited spatial and contrast resolution. With the present technique, the detection of vulnerable plaques by MDCT remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17849236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.