Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17846853›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2008

A prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial comparing ertapenem 3 vs >or=5 days in community-acquired intraabdominal infection.

Antonio Basoli, Piero Chirletti, Ercole Cirino, Nicola G D'Ovidio, Giovanni Battista Doglietto, Domenico Giglio, Stefano M Giulini, Alberto Malizia, Mario Taffurelli, Jelena Petrovic and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00630513 (A Prospective, Double-blind, Multi Center, Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem 3 Days Versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 Days in the Treatment of Localized Community Acquired Intra-abdominal Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00630513 phase4completednot on this map

A Prospective, Double-blind, Multi Center, Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem 3 Days Versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 Days in the Treatment of Localized Community Acquired Intra-abdominal Infection (IAI). (T.E.A. Study Three Days Ertapenem vs Three Days Ampicillin- Sulbactam)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BolognaRan2008 to 2010Enrolled142ConditionsIntra-Abdominal InfectionArmsErtapenem, Ampicillin-Sulbactam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. White paper on antimicrobial stewardship in solid organ transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Short-Course Antimicrobial Therapy for Intraabdominal Infection.The New England journal of medicine · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2013
    Article
  19. Duration of antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients with bloodstream infections: A retrospective cohort study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Antonio BasoliDepartment Paride Stefanini, University La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I Viale del Policlinico, 00161, Rome, Italy. antonio.basoli@uniroma1.it
Piero Chirletti
Ercole Cirino
Nicola G D'Ovidio
Giovanni Battista Doglietto
Domenico Giglio
Stefano M Giulini
Alberto Malizia
Mario Taffurelli
Jelena Petrovic
Maurizio Ecari
Italian Study Group
MSD K.K. (Japan) · JPSapienza University of Rome · ITBrescia University · USOspedale San Giovanni Bosco · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe secondary peritonitis is diagnosed in only 20-30% of all patients, but studies to date have persisted in using a standard fixed duration of antibiotic therapy. This prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized clinical study compared the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerability of ertapenem (1 g/day) 3 days (group I) vs >or=5 days (group II) in 111 patients with localized peritonitis (appendicitis vs non-appendicitis) of mild to moderate severity, requiring surgical intervention. In evaluable patients, the clinical response as primary efficacy outcome were assessed at the test-of-cure 2 and 4 weeks after discontinuation of antibacterial therapy. Ninety patients were evaluable. In groups I and II, 92.9 and 89.6% of patients were cured, respectively; 95.3% in group I and 93.7% in group II showed eradication. These differences were not statistically significant. The most frequent bacteria recovered were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. A wound infection developed in seven patients (7.7%) and an intraabdominal infection in one patient (1.1%). There was a low frequency of drug-related clinical or laboratory adverse effects in both groups. Our study demonstrated that, in patients with localized community-acquired intraabdominal infection, a 3-day course of ertapenem had the same clinical and bacteriological efficacy as a standard duration.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAPACHEAppendicitisbeta-LactamsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodErtapenemHumansPeritonitisProspective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsErtapenem

Identifiers

PMID17846853
OpenAlexW2006141161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.