Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17846784›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2007

The gene doublesex of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) and its evolution in insects.

María Fernanda Ruiz, José María Eirín-López, Rominy N Stefani, André L P Perondini, Denise Selivon, Lucas Sánchez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Function and evolution of sex determination mechanisms, genes and pathways in insects.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María Fernanda RuizCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
José María Eirín-López
Rominy N Stefani
André L P Perondini
Denise Selivon
Lucas Sánchez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The doublesex (dsx) gene of several Anastrepha species was isolated and characterised. Its molecular organisation was found to be the same in all the species examined. This gene is composed of four exons: Exons 1 and 2 are common to both sexes, exon 3 is female specific, and exon 4 is male specific. It codes for both the female DsxF and male DsxM proteins, corresponding to the sex-specific splicing product of its primary transcript; male-specific splicing is the default mode. A comparison of the Dsx proteins of different Anastrepha species with those of other insects showed them to be very similar. Molecular evolutionary analysis (both at the nucleotide and amino acid levels) of dsx in different insects revealed a topology in good agreement with their owners' taxonomic relationships. The great majority of the nucleotide changes detected in the dsx gene of the analysed species were significantly synonymous, evidence that strong purifying selection has acted on dsx so that the functional structure of the Dsx proteins is preserved. However, the common region of DsxF and DsxM proteins appeared to be the main target for selection acting upon the long-term evolution of gene dsx.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectAnimalsBase SequenceDNA PrimersEvolution, MolecularFemaleInsectaInsect ProteinsMalePhylogenyRNA PrecursorsRNA SplicingSex Determination ProcessesTephritidaeDNA PrimersInsect ProteinsRNA Precursors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.