Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17846135›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.

Manon J van der Lee, Audrey A M Blenke, Gerard A Rongen, Corrien P W G M Verwey-van Wissen, Peter P Koopmans, Cristina Pharo, David M Burger

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Managing drug interactions in HIV-infected adults with comorbid illness.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Polypharmacy in the HIV-infected older adult population.Clinical interventions in aging · 2013
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current awareness: pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2008
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manon J van der LeeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.vanderlee@akf.umcn.nl
Audrey A M Blenke
Gerard A Rongen
Corrien P W G M Verwey-van Wissen
Peter P Koopmans
Cristina Pharo
David M Burger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients have an increased risk for depression. Despite the high potential for drug-drug interactions, limited data on the combined use of antidepressants and antiretrovirals are available. Theoretically, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors may inhibit CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of paroxetine. We wanted to determine the effect of fosamprenavir-ritonavir on paroxetine pharmacokinetics and vice versa and to evaluate the safety of the combination. Group A started with 20 mg paroxetine every day for 10 days; after a wash-out period of 16 days, subjects received paroxetine (20 mg every day) plus fosamprenavir-ritonavir (700/100 mg twice a day) from days 28 to 37. Group B received the regimens in reverse order. On days 10 and 37, pharmacokinetic curves were recorded. Twenty-six healthy subjects (18 females, 8 males) were included. Median (range) age and weight were 44.4 (18.2 to 64.3) years and 68.8 (51.0 to 89.4) kg. Three subjects were excluded (two because of adverse events; one for nonadherence). Addition of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to paroxetine resulted in a significant decrease in paroxetine exposure: the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of paroxetine plus fosamprenavir-ritonavir to paroxetine alone were 0.45 (0.41 to 0.49) for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), 0.49 (0.45 to 0.53) for the maximum concentration of the drug in plasma (C(max)), and 0.75 (0.71 to 0.80) for the apparent elimination half-life (t(1/2)). The free fraction of paroxetine showed a median (interquartile range) increase of 30% (18 to 42%) after the addition of fosamprenavir-ritonavir. The AUC(0-12), C(max), C(min), and t(1/2) of amprenavir and ritonavir were similar to those of historical controls. No serious adverse events occurred. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir reduced total paroxetine exposure by 55%. This is partly explained by protein displacement of paroxetine. We think that this interaction is clinically relevant and that titration to a higher dose of paroxetine may be necessary to accomplish the needed antidepressant effect.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAnti-HIV AgentsArea Under CurveCarbamatesDrug InteractionsFemaleFuransGenotypeHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedOrganophosphatesAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAnti-HIV AgentsCarbamatesfosamprenavirFuransOrganophosphatesParoxetineRitonavirSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID17846135
PMCPMC2151442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.