ArticleInternational journal of gastrointestinal cancer2006
Mitochondrial DNA mutations in pancreatic cancer.
Article in International journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the impact of mitochondrial DNA mutations on aging and carcinogenesis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Metabolic reprogramming in cancer and senescence.MedComm · 2025Review
- Illuminating the immunological landscape: mitochondrial gene defects in pancreatic cancer through a multiomics lens.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- First-in-Class NADH/Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Core Subunit S7 (NDUFS7) Antagonist for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023Article
- Detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in circulating mitochondria-originated extracellular vesicles for potential diagnostic applications in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Heterologous Inferential Analysis (HIA) and Other Emerging Concepts: In Understanding Mitochondrial Variation In Pathogenesis: There is no More Low-Hanging Fruit.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- The Significance of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Recent advances in research on aspartate β-hydroxylase (ASPH) in pancreatic cancer: A brief update.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2018Review
- Rewiring carbohydrate catabolism differentially affects survival of pancreatic cancer cell lines with diverse metabolic profiles.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Mitochondrial deficiency impairs hypoxic induction of HIF-1 transcriptional activity and retards tumor growth.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- An Overview of Genetic Changes and Risk of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2016Review
- Opportunities and challenges for selected emerging technologies in cancer epidemiology: mitochondrial, epigenomic, metabolomic, and telomerase profiling.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013Review
- Circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum (CNAPS): applications in oncology.OncoTargets and therapy · 2013Article
- Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and risk of pancreatic cancer.Cancer research · 2012Article
- Lymphoblastoid Cell lines: a Continuous in Vitro Source of Cells to Study Carcinogen Sensitivity and DNA Repair.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2012Review
- ReseqChip: automated integration of multiple local context probe data from the MitoChip array in mitochondrial DNA sequence assembly.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- MtDNA mutation pattern in tumors and human evolution are shaped by similar selective constraints.Genome research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSomatic mutations of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are increasingly being recognized in many human cancers, but automated sequencing of 16.5 kb of DNA poses an onerous task. We have recently described an oligonucleotide microarray (MitoChip) for rapid and accurate sequencing of the entire mitochondrial genome (Zhou et al., J Mol Diagnostics, 8: 9_14, 2006), greatly facilitating the analysis of mtDNA mutations in cancer. In this report, we perform a comprehensive cataloging of somatic mutations in the mitochondrial genome of human pancreatic cancers using our novel array-based approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsMitoChip analysis was performed on DNA isolated from 15 histologically confirmed resection specimens of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. In all cases, matched nonneoplastic pancreatic tissue was obtained as germline control for mtDNA sequence. DNA was extracted from snap-frozen cryostat-embedded specimens and hybridized to the sequencing microarray after appropriate polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling steps. The vast majority of somatic mutational analyses of mtDNA in human cancers utilize lymphocyte DNA as germline control, without excluding the potential for organ-specific polymorphisms. Therefore, we also examined a series of 15 paired samples of DNA obtained from nonneoplastic pancreata and corresponding EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines to determine whether lymphocyte DNA provides an accurate surrogate for the mtDNA sequence of pancreatic tissue.
resultsWe sequenced 497,070 base pairs of mtDNA in the 15 matched samples of pancreatic cancer and nonneoplastic pancreatic tissue, and 467,269 base pairs (94.0%) were assigned by the automated genotyping software. All 15 pancreatic cancers demonstrated at least one somatic mtDNA mutation compared to the control germline DNA with a range of 1-14 alterations. Of the 71 somatic mutations observed in our series, 18 were nonsynonymous coding region alterations (i.e., resulting in an amino acid change), 22 were synonymous coding region alterations, and 31 involved noncoding mtDNA segments (including ribosomal and transfer RNAs). Overall, somatic mutations in the coding region most commonly involved the ND4, COI, and CYTB genes; of note, an A-G transition at nucleotide position 841 in the 12sRNA was observed in three independent samples. In the paired analysis of nonneoplastic pancreata and lymphoblastoid cell line DNA, 14 nucleotide discrepancies were observed out of 226,876 nucleotide sequences (a concordance rate of 99.99%), with 9 samples demonstrating a perfect match across all bases assigned.
conclusionsOur findings confirm that somatic mtDNA mutations are common in pancreatic cancers, and therefore, have the potential to be a clinically useful biomarker for early detection. Further, our studies confirm that lymphocyte DNA is an excellent, albeit not perfect, surrogate for nonneoplastic pancreatic tissues in terms of being utilized as a germline control. Finally, our report confirms the utility of a high-throughput array-based platform for mtDNA mutational analyses of human cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.