Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17826336›Full record

ArticleTrends in parasitology2007

Cryptosporidium parvum infection in cattle: are current perceptions accurate?

Ryan M O'Handley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in parasitology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic characterisation ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Humans and cattle: a review of bovine zoonoses.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ryan M O'HandleyEnvironmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia. r.ohandley@murdoch.edu.au
University of Prince Edward Island · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception that cattle are major reservoirs for Cryptosporidium parvum infections in humans and that C. parvum is a major cause of diarrhea and production loss in cattle might not reflect the whole situation. Numerous management factors influence the epidemiological and clinical picture associated with C. parvum infections in cattle. Whereas C. parvum is highly prevalent in young dairy calves and confined beef calves, it occurs rarely in calves on range and in adult cattle. In well-managed herds, clinical disease due to C. parvum is also rare. Therefore, C. parvum infections in cattle might not be as important as current perceptions would indicate.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumDiarrheaDisease ReservoirsFemaleHumansPrevalenceZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID17826336
PMCPMC7106378
OpenAlexW2136906028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.