ArticleExperimental cell research2008
Identification of functional domains in AKT responsible for distinct roles of AKT isoforms in pressure-stimulated cancer cell adhesion.
Article in Experimental cell research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Signaling specificity in the Akt pathway in biology and disease.Advances in biological regulation · 2014Review
- Identification of the angiogenic gene signature induced by EGF and hypoxia in colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2013Article
- The roles of Akt and NOSs in regulation of VLA-4-mediated melanoma cell adhesion to endothelial VCAM-1 after UVB-irradiation.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2011Article
- Akt directly regulates focal adhesion kinase through association and serine phosphorylation: implication for pressure-induced colon cancer metastasis.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2011Article
- Delineating the signals by which repetitive deformation stimulates intestinal epithelial migration across fibronectin.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2009Article
- Biological impact of mechanical stimuli on tumor metastasis.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2009Article
- Strain-induced proliferation requires the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/glycogen synthase kinase pathway.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009Article
- Colchicine inhibits pressure-induced tumor cell implantation within surgical wounds and enhances tumor-free survival in mice.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2008Article
- Physical and functional characterization of the genetic locus of IBtk, an inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase: evidence for three protein isoforms of IBtk.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Evolving management of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cell adhesion is a critical step in cancer metastasis, activated by extracellular forces such as pressure and shear. Reducing AKT1, but not AKT2, ablates the increase in cancer cell adhesion associated with 15 mm Hg increased extracellular pressure. To identify the determinants of this AKT isoform specificity, we exchanged the pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and/or hinge regions of AKT1 and AKT2. Wild type isoforms or these chimeras were overexpressed in Caco-2 cells in the absence or presence of isoform-specific siRNA to suppress endogenous AKT1. Pressure-induced AKT translocation and phosphorylation to the membrane were compared, along with the stimulation of cell adhesion by pressure. Pressure stimulated translocation of AKT1, but not AKT2 to the plasma membrane. Among our chimeras, only the chimeric AKT2 (chimera2), in which both the AKT2 PH domain and hinge region had been replaced by those of AKT1, translocated to the membrane in response to pressure. Similarly, only chimera2 rescued the function of AKT1 in mediating pressure-stimulated adhesion after endogenous AKT1 had been reduced. Pressure also promoted phosphorylation of AKT1 but not AKT2, and expression of a nonphosphorylatable double point mutant prevented pressure-stimulated adhesion. Among the chimeras, pressure promoted only chimera2 phosphorylation. These results identify the AKT1 PH domain and hinge region as functional domains which jointly permit AKT1 translocation and phosphorylation in response to extracellular pressure and distinguish determine the specificity of AKT1 in mediating the effects of extracellular pressure on cancer cell adhesion. These may be useful targets for interventions to inhibit metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.