Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17825017›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2007

Bayesian inference for the lead time in periodic cancer screening.

Dongfeng Wu, Gary L Rosner, Lyle D Broemeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Evaluating Semi-Markov Processes and Other Epidemiological Time-to-Event Models by Computing Disease Sojourn Density as Partial Differential Equations.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. When to initiate cancer screening exam?Statistics and its interface · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bayesian lead time estimation for the Johns Hopkins Lung Project data.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2013
    Article
  8. Sojourn time and lead time projection in lung cancer screening.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How does early detection by screening affect disease progression? Modeling estimated benefits in prostate cancer screening.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongfeng WuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA. dwu@math.msstate.edu
Gary L Rosner
Lyle D Broemeling

Funding

UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in MelanomaP50CA093459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GRIMM, ELIZABETH A · 2004 to 2014
$23.7M
Statistical Inference for Lead Time in Cancer ScreeningR03CA115012 · NCI · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, DONGFENG · 2005 to 2006
$136k
NCI NIH HHS CA-093459NCI NIH HHS CA-115012NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093459NCI NIH HHS R03 CA115012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article develops a probability distribution for the lead time in periodic cancer screening examinations. The general aim is to allow statistical inference for a screening program's lead time, the length of time the diagnosis is advanced by screening. The program's lead time is distributed as a mixture of a point mass and a piecewise continuous distribution. Simulation studies using the HIP (Health Insurance Plan for Greater New York) study's data provide estimates of different characteristics of a screening program under different screening frequencies. The components of this mixture represent two aspects of screening's benefit, namely, a reduction in the number of interval cases and the extent by which screening advanced the age of diagnosis. We present estimates of these two measures for participants in a breast cancer screening program. We also provide the mean, mode, variance, and density curve of the program's lead time. The model can provide policy makers with important information regarding the screening period, frequency, and the endpoints that may serve as surrogates for the benefit to women who take part in a periodic screening program. Though the study focuses on breast cancer screening, it is also applicable to other kinds of chronic disease.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBiometryBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPopulation SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17825017
PMCPMC2020448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.