Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17824955›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2007

Drug-resistant malaria - an insight.

John E Hyde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unlocking the Enigmas ofCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Treatment of avian malaria in captive African penguins (International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Efficacy of enoxacin and levofloxacin againstIranian journal of veterinary research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John E HydeManchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, UK. john.hyde@manchester.ac.uk

Funding

Wellcome Trust 056845Wellcome Trust 073896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite intensive research extending back to the 1930s, when the first synthetic antimalarial drugs made their appearance, the repertoire of clinically licensed formulations remains very limited. Moreover, widespread and increasing resistance to these drugs contributes enormously to the difficulties in controlling malaria, posing considerable intellectual, technical and humanitarian challenges. A detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to these agents is emerging that should permit new drugs to be rationally developed and older ones to be engineered to regain their efficacy. This review summarizes recent progress in analysing the causes of resistance to the major antimalarial drugs and its spread.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAnimalsAntimalarialsArtemisininsAtovaquoneChloroquineFolic Acid AntagonistsHumansMalariaAntimalarialsArtemisininsAtovaquoneChloroquineFolic Acid Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID17824955
PMCPMC2720519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.