ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2008
Improving alloreactive CTL immunotherapy for malignant gliomas using a simulation model of their interactive dynamics.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- CAR-T cell therapy for glioblastoma: insight from mathematical modeling.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Spatial computational modelling illuminates the role of the tumour microenvironment for treating glioblastoma with immunotherapies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Chemoimmunotherapy Administration Protocol Design for the Treatment of Leukemia through Mathematical Modeling and In Silico Experimentation.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of a glioma immune interaction model.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- AnSmall methods · 2021Article
- CARTCancers · 2021Article
- Personalized Immunotherapy Treatment Strategies for a Dynamical System of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.Cancers · 2021Article
- A mathematical model for the quantification of a patient's sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors and long-term tumour burden.Nature biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Less is more: reducing the number of administered chimeric antigen receptor T cells in a mouse model using a mathematically guided approach.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2020Article
- Cancer-induced immunosuppression can enable effectiveness of immunotherapy through bistability generation: A mathematical and computational examination.Journal of theoretical biology · 2020Article
- Computational Approaches in Theranostics: Mining and Predicting Cancer Data.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- Quantitative Mechanistic Modeling in Support of Pharmacological Therapeutics Development in Immuno-Oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Modeling Macrophage Polarization and Its Effect on Cancer Treatment Success.Open journal of immunology · 2018Article
- Addressing current challenges in cancer immunotherapy with mathematical and computational modelling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Review
- Mathematical Models for Immunology: Current State of the Art and Future Research Directions.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2016Review
- Asymptotic dynamics of some t-periodic one-dimensional model with application to prostate cancer immunotherapy.Journal of mathematical biology · 2016Article
- Modeling the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Cancer Stem Cells with Ordinary Differential Equations.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2016Article
- Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2015Review
- Enhancing dendritic cell immunotherapy for melanoma using a simple mathematical model.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2015Article
- A mathematical model to elucidate brain tumor abrogation by immunotherapy with T11 target structure.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), a highly aggressive (WHO grade IV) primary brain tumor, is refractory to traditional treatments, such as surgery, radiation or chemotherapy. This study aims at aiding in the design of more efficacious GBM therapies. We constructed a mathematical model for glioma and the immune system interactions, that may ensue upon direct intra-tumoral administration of ex vivo activated alloreactive cytotoxic-T-lymphocytes (aCTL). Our model encompasses considerations of the interactive dynamics of aCTL, tumor cells, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and MHC class II molecules, as well as cytokines, such as TGF-beta and IFN-gamma, which dampen or increase the pro-inflammatory environment, respectively. Computer simulations were used for model verification and for retrieving putative treatment scenarios. The mathematical model successfully retrieved clinical trial results of efficacious aCTL immunotherapy for recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma and anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III). It predicted that cellular adoptive immunotherapy failed in GBM because the administered dose was 20-fold lower than required for therapeutic efficacy. Model analysis suggests that GBM may be eradicated by new dose-intensive strategies, e.g., 3 x 10(8) aCTL every 4 days for small tumor burden, or 2 x 10(9) aCTL, infused every 5 days for larger tumor burden. Further analysis pinpoints crucial bio-markers relating to tumor growth rate, tumor size, and tumor sensitivity to the immune system, whose estimation enables regimen personalization. We propose that adoptive cellular immunotherapy was prematurely abandoned. It may prove efficacious for GBM, if dose intensity is augmented, as prescribed by the mathematical model. Re-initiation of clinical trials, using calculated individualized regimens for grade III-IV malignant glioma, is suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.