Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17823137›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2007

Indication creep: physician beware.

Paul C Hébert, Matthew Stanbrook

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04186598 (Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Control Trial Evaluating the Utility of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04186598 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Control Trial Evaluating the Utility of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in the Treatment of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCommonSpirit HealthRan2020 to 2023Enrolled64ConditionsContinuous Positive Airway Pressure, High Altitude Pulmonary EdemaArmsCPAP mask system, Nifedipine 30 MG, CPAP mask system without PEEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of professional societies in limiting indication creep.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa: why we need better drug monitoring.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul C Hébert
Matthew Stanbrook

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Product Surveillance, PostmarketingClinical Trials as TopicDrug LabelingHumans

Identifiers

PMID17823137
PMCPMC1976648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.