Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17822965›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2007

p53 suppression overwhelms DNA polymerase eta deficiency in determining the cellular UV DNA damage response.

Rebecca R Laposa, Luzviminda Feeney, Eileen Crowley, Sebastien de Feraudy, James E Cleaver

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Drugging in the absence of p53.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Dysmyelination not demyelination causes neurological symptoms in preweaned mice in a murine model of Cockayne syndrome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A minority of foci or pan-nuclear apoptotic staining of gammaH2AX in the S phase after UV damage contain DNA double-strand breaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca R LaposaUCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, Auerback Melanoma Laboratory, Room N461, Box 0808, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143-0808, United States.
Luzviminda Feeney
Eileen Crowley
Sebastien de Feraudy
James E Cleaver
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Translational InformaticsP30CA082103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jennifer Leigh Clarke · 1999 to 2026
$209.7M
Tissue CoreP01AR050440 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EPSTEIN, ERVIN HAROLD · 2003 to 2007
$6.9M
XP VARIANT--A HUMAN MUTATOR GENE FOR UV DAMAGER01ES008061 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI CLEAVER, JAMES E · 1998 to 2005
$1.8M
DNA Damage and Neurodegeneration in Cockayne SyndromeR01NS052781 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CLEAVER, JAMES E · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1 F32 CA099499-01A1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082103NCI NIH HHS P30 CA82103NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR050440NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR050440-01NIEHS NIH HHS 1 R01 ES 8061NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES008061NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS052781NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) cells lack the damage-specific DNA polymerase eta and have normal excision repair but show defective DNA replication after UV irradiation. Previous studies using cells transformed with SV40 or HPV16 (E6/E7) suggested that the S-phase response to UV damage is altered in XP-V cells with non-functional p53. To investigate the role of p53 directly we targeted p53 in normal and XP-V fibroblasts using short hairpin RNA. The shRNA reduced expression of p53, and the downstream cell cycle effector p21, in control and UV irradiated cells. Cells accumulated in late S phase after UV, but after down-regulation of p53 they accumulated earlier in S. Cells in which p53 was inhibited showed ongoing genomic instability at the replication fork. Cells exhibited high levels of UV induced S-phase gammaH2Ax phosphorylation representative of exposed single strand regions of DNA and foci of Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 representative of double strand breaks. Cells also showed increased variability of genomic copy numbers after long-term inhibition of p53. Inhibition of p53 expression dominated the DNA damage response. Comparison with earlier results indicates that in virally transformed cells cellular targets other than p53 play important roles in the UV DNA damage response.

Indexed as

DNA DamageUltraviolet RaysBase SequenceCells, CulturedDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersDNA ReplicationFlow CytometryGenomic InstabilityImmunohistochemistryPhosphorylationRNA InterferenceS PhaseTumor Suppressor Protein p53Y-Family DNA PolymerasesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersRad30 proteinTumor Suppressor Protein p53Y-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID17822965
PMCPMC2239317
OpenAlexW1982777457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.