ArticleInternational journal of impotence research
The impact of formulary replacement of sildenafil by vardenafil at a local VA hospital.
Article in International journal of impotence research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Veterans Administration (VA) changed its formulary agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction from sildenafil to vardenafil in January 2006 for economic reasons. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of this formulary change on the patients at a local VA hospital. All non-formulary requests for sildenafil between January 2006 and September 2006 were reviewed. A total of 169 non-formulary requests were made for sildenafil while 7657 patients filled vardenafil prescriptions. Overall, the formulary change from sildenafil to vardenafil appeared to be well tolerated by the vast majority of patients at this local VA hospital. The substantial cost savings to the VA seem to be justified by the minimal adverse effects on men treated for erectile dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17805337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.