Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17803341›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2007

The concept of complete remission of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease : comparative efficacy of pantoprazole and esomeprazole using the ReQuest questionnaire.

Alan B R Thomson

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan B R ThomsonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. alan.thomson@ualberta.ca
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is associated with a broad array of symptoms that may be typical or atypical of the disease and that may be accompanied by erosive oesophagitis. Symptom scales that have historically been employed to assess response to treatment in GORD clinical trials do not typically account for the heterogeneous, episodic nature of GORD and the poor correlation between patients' and physicians' assessment of symptoms. The ReQuest questionnaire permits self-assessment of changes on a broad range of GORD-related symptoms on a daily basis and in combination with the Los Angeles (LA)-classification (ReQuest/LA-classification) to assess complete remission of GORD. Pantoprazole and esomeprazole are two of the newer proton pump inhibitors and are the first to be systematically reviewed using the ReQuest(trade mark) questionnaire. Results from recent head-to-head trials have shown pantoprazole and esomeprazole to be highly and equally effective treatments for (i) rapid and sustained relief of ReQuest-assessed GORD-related symptoms in patients with non-erosive GORD or endoscopically confirmed erosive GORD, and (ii) achieving a combined outcome comprising endoscopically confirmed healing and ReQuest-assessed symptom relief in patients with erosive GORD. There is some preliminary evidence to suggest that pantoprazole may be the better choice of treatment in terms of its potential to maintain control of symptoms in patients for whom night-time symptoms are a concern and if taken as on-demand rather than continuous maintenance therapy.

Indexed as

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesAnti-Ulcer AgentsDatabases, FactualEsomeprazoleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansPantoprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesAnti-Ulcer AgentsEsomeprazolePantoprazoleProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID17803341
OpenAlexW1898364441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.