Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17786220›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Segmental duplication implicated in the genesis of inversion 2Rj of Anopheles gambiae.

Mamadou B Coulibaly, Neil F Lobo, Meagan C Fitzpatrick, Marcia Kern, Olga Grushko, Daniel V Thaner, Sékou F Traoré, Frank H Collins, Nora J Besansky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mamadou B CoulibalyCenter for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Neil F Lobo
Meagan C Fitzpatrick
Marcia Kern
Olga Grushko
Daniel V Thaner
Sékou F Traoré
Frank H Collins
Nora J Besansky

Funding

THE ANOPHELES GAMBIAE GENOME PROJECTU01AI048846 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI COLLINS, FRANK H. · 2001 to 2002
$2.9M
Ecological Genomics of Anopheles gambiaeR01AI063508 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA JESSIE · 2005 to 2009
$2.7M
Genetics of Anopheles funestus populationsR01AI048842 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BESANSKY, NORA J · 2001 to 2005
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048842NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063508NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI48842NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI63508NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI048846NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI48846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The malaria vector Anopheles gambiae maintains high levels of inversion polymorphism that facilitate its exploitation of diverse ecological settings across tropical Africa. Molecular characterization of inversion breakpoints is a first step toward understanding the processes that generate and maintain inversions. Here we focused on inversion 2Rj because of its association with the assortatively mating Bamako chromosomal form of An. gambiae, whose distinctive breeding sites are rock pools beside the Niger River in Mali and Guinea. Sequence and computational analysis of 2Rj revealed the same 14.6 kb insertion between both breakpoints, which occurred near but not within predicted genes. Each insertion consists of 5.3 kb terminal inverted repeat arms separated by a 4 kb spacer. The insertions lack coding capacity, and are comprised of degraded remnants of repetitive sequences including class I and II transposable elements. Because of their large size and patchwork composition, and as no other instances of these insertions were identified in the An. gambiae genome, they do not appear to be transposable elements. The 14.6 kb modules inserted at both 2Rj breakpoint junctions represent low copy repeats (LCRs, also called segmental duplications) that are strongly implicated in the recent (approximately 0.4N(e) generations) origin of 2Rj. The LCRs contribute to further genome instability, as demonstrated by an imprecise excision event at the proximal breakpoint of 2Rj in field isolates.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenes, InsectAnimalsAnophelesBase SequenceIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID17786220
PMCPMC1952172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.