Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17785707›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2007

Relationship between epidemiologic risk factors and breast cancer recurrence.

Abenaa M Brewster, Kim-Anh Do, Patricia A Thompson, Karin M Hahn, Aysegul A Sahin, Yumei Cao, Maureen M Stewart, James L Murray, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Melissa L Bondy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Spatial analysis of county-level breast cancer mortality in Texas.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abenaa M BrewsterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. abrewster@mdanderson.org
Kim-Anh Do
Patricia A Thompson
Karin M Hahn
Aysegul A Sahin
Yumei Cao
Maureen M Stewart
James L Murray
Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Melissa L Bondy
University of Arizona · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UTMDACC SPORE in Breast CancerP50CA116199 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERRY, DONALD A · 2005 to 2009
$11.9M
Determinants of Breast Cancer SurvivalR01CA089608 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BONDY, MELISSA L · 2002 to 2006
$3.1M
Insulin Resistance and Breast Cancer OutcomeR03CA123553 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BREWSTER, ABENAA M · 2006 to 2007
$148k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116199NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089608NCI NIH HHS R03 CA123553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly-stage breast cancers are biologically heterogeneous and vary in clinical behavior, supporting the role of factors other than tumor size and lymph node involvement as outcome determinants. We evaluated the effect of epidemiologic breast cancer risk factors on recurrence in women with early-stage disease. PATIENTS AND

methodsMedical records from 2,327 women with early-stage breast cancer, treated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1985 and 2000, were used to derive information on epidemiologic, clinical, and histological factors. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios of 5-year risk of breast cancer recurrence adjusted for treatment and stage. Statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsNone of the breast cancer risk factors were associated with recurrence, adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment. A significant interaction between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use and tumor hormone receptor status on risk of recurrence (P = .0003) was observed. Among ever-users of HRT, recurrence risk was two-fold lower for estrogen receptor (ER)--positive and progesterone receptor (PR)--positive tumors compared with ER- and PR-negative tumors; whereas, among never-users of HRT, there was no statistically significant association between recurrence risk and receptor status.

conclusionHRT users who develop receptor-positive early-stage disease have better outcomes than those who develop receptor-negative disease. Among never-users of HRT, the expected beneficial effect of ER- or PR-positive tumors on recurrence risk was absent. These data lend support to the notion that the biology of hormone receptor-positive disease in HRT users differs from that in nonusers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTexasReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID17785707
PMCPMC6559726
OpenAlexW2060615966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.