ReviewJAMA2007
Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969-2007.
Review in JAMA, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017Pooled it
- Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013Pooled it
- The diversity of educational research in the health professions: More opportunities than challenges.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Eye on the Prize: Patient Outcomes Research in Medical Education.ATS scholar · 2024Article
- The educational paradigm shift-a phenomenographic study of medical teachers' experiences of practices.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Is German Medical Education Research on the rise? An analysis of publications from the years 2004 to 2013.GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung · 2015Review
- Expertise, Time, Money, Mentoring, and Reward: Systemic Barriers That Limit Education Researcher Productivity-Proceedings From the AAMC GEA Workshop.Journal of graduate medical education · 2014Article
- The active participation of German-speaking countries in conferences of the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) between 2005 and 2013: a reflection of the development of medical education research?GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung · 2014Article
- Assessing the impact of innovative training of family physicians for the patient-centered medical home.Journal of graduate medical education · 2012Article
- Patient safety, resident education and resident well-being following implementation of the 2003 ACGME duty hour rules.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011Review
- Women's Health Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.Journal of graduate medical education · 2010Article
- Utility of the AAMC's Graduation Questionnaire to study behavioral and social sciences domains in undergraduate medical education.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2010Article
- Cost-effective undergraduate medical education?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2009Article
- Evaluation of a Preclerkship Learning Community Model for Delivering Clinical Skills Curriculum.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextEvidence-based medical education requires rigorous studies appraising educational efficacy.
objectivesTo assess trends over time in methods used to evaluate undergraduate medical education interventions and to identify whether participation of medical education departments or centers is associated with more rigorous methods. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, Campbell Collaboration, and ERIC databases (January 1966-March 2007) were searched using terms equivalent to students, medical and education, medical crossed with all relevant study designs. STUDY SELECTION: We selected publications in all languages from every fifth year, plus the most recent 12 months, that evaluated an educational intervention for undergraduate medical students. Four hundred seventy-two publications met criteria for review. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were abstracted on number of participants; types of comparison groups; whether outcomes assessed were objective, subjective, and/or validated; timing of outcome assessments; funding; and participation of medical education departments and centers. Ten percent of publications were independently abstracted by 2 authors to assess validity of the data abstraction.
resultsThe annual number of publications increased over time from 1 (1969-1970) to 147 (2006-2007). In the most recent year, there was a mean of 145 medical student participants; 9 (6%) recruited participants from multiple institutions; 80 (54%) used comparison groups; 37 (25%) used randomized control groups; 91 (62%) had objective outcomes; 23 (16%) had validated outcomes; 35 (24%) assessed an outcome more than 1 month later; 21 (14%) estimated statistical power; and 66 (45%) reported funding. In 2006-2007, medical education department or center participation, reported in 46 (31%) of the recent publications, was associated only with enrolling more medical student participants (P = .04); for all studies from 1969 to 2007, it was associated only with measuring an objective outcome (P = .048). Between 1969 and 2007, the percentage of publications reporting statistical power and funding increased; percentages did not change for other study features.
conclusionsThe annual number of published studies of undergraduate medical education interventions demonstrating methodological rigor has been increasing. However, considerable opportunities for improvement remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.