ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007
Control of transposase activity within a transpososome by the configuration of the flanking DNA segment of the transposon.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transposition mechanism of ISAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Target DNA bending by the Mu transpososome promotes careful transposition and prevents its reversal.eLife · 2017Article
- Transposable Phage Mu.Microbiology spectrum · 2014Review
- Assembly of prototype foamy virus strand transfer complexes on product DNA bypassing catalysis of integration.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2012Article
- Article
- Intrinsic characteristics of neighboring DNA modulate transposable element activity in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The multiple steps of DNA transposition take place within a large complex called the transpososome, in which a pair of transposon DNA ends are synapsed by a multimer of the transposase protein. The final step, a DNA strand transfer reaction that joins the transposon ends to the target DNA strands, entails no net change in the number of high-energy chemical bonds. Physiology demands that, despite remaining stably associated with the transpososome, the strand transfer products undergo neither the reverse reaction nor any further cleavage reactions. Accordingly, when the Mu or Tn10 strand transfer complex was produced in vitro through transposase-catalyzed reaction steps, reverse reactions were undetectable. In contrast, when the Mu or Tn10 strand transfer complexes were assembled from DNA already having the structure of the strand transfer product, we detected a reaction that resembled reversal of target DNA strand transfer. The stereoselectivity of phosphorothioate-containing substrates indicated that this reaction proceeds as the pseudoreversal of the normal target DNA strand transfer step. Comparison of the reactivity of closely related Mu substrate DNA structures indicated that the configuration of the flanking DNA outside of the transposon sequence plays a key role in preventing the transposon end cleavage reaction after the strand transfer step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.