Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17784844›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2008

Correlation of obesity and osteoporosis: effect of fat mass on the determination of osteoporosis.

Lan-Juan Zhao, Hui Jiang, Christopher J Papasian, Dev Maulik, Betty Drees, James Hamilton, Hong-Wen Deng

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 530 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis: a consensus of the Belgian Bone Club.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lan-Juan ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Hui Jiang
Christopher J Papasian
Dev Maulik
Betty Drees
James Hamilton
Hong-Wen Deng
University of Missouri–Kansas City · USHunan Normal University · CN

Funding

ROBUST AND POWERFUL TEST OF CANDIDATE GENES TO BONE MASSR01AR050496 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
CHARACTERIZATION OF DELETERIOUS GENOMIC MUTATIONSR01GM060402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2000 to 2005
$889k
Genetic Basis of Osteoporotic Fractures and Bone MassK01AR002170 · NIAMS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2001 to 2005
$505k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR002170NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR02170-01NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060402NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM60402-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It was previously believed that obesity and osteoporosis were two unrelated diseases, but recent studies have shown that both diseases share several common genetic and environmental factors. Body fat mass, a component of body weight, is one of the most important indices of obesity, and a substantial body of evidence indicates that fat mass may have beneficial effects on bone. Contrasting studies, however, suggest that excessive fat mass may not protect against osteoporosis or osteoporotic fracture. Differences in experimental design, sample structure, and even the selection of covariates may account for some of these inconsistent or contradictory results. Despite the lack of a clear consensus regarding the impact of effects of fat on bone, a number of mechanistic explanations have been proposed to support the observed epidemiologic and physiologic associations between fat and bone. The common precursor stem cell that leads to the differentiation of both adipocytes and osteoblasts, as well the secretion of adipocyte-derived hormones that affect bone development, may partially explain these associations. Based on our current state of knowledge, it is unclear whether fat has beneficial effects on bone. We anticipate that this will be an active and fruitful focus of research in the coming years.

Indexed as

11-beta-Hydroxysteroid DehydrogenasesAdipocytesAdiponectinAdipose TissueAmyloidAromataseBone DensityCell DifferentiationFemaleHumansInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIInterleukin-6Islet Amyloid PolypeptideLeptinMale11-beta-Hydroxysteroid DehydrogenasesAdiponectinADIPOQ protein, humanAmyloidAromataseInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIInterleukin-6Islet Amyloid PolypeptideLeptinPeptide FragmentsPPAR gammapreptinResistinRETN protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor betaWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17784844
PMCPMC2663586
OpenAlexW2003298815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.