Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1778353›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia1991

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). VIII. Study design, progress and performance.

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metformin for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024 · on this map
    Pooled it
  3. Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  5. Metformin monotherapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · on this map
    Pooled it
  6. First-line drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Glucose targets for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  12. Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) is a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, intervention trial of 5100 newly-diagnosed patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus which aims to determine whether improved blood glucose control will prevent complications and reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. Newly presenting Type 2 diabetic patients aged 25-65 years inclusive, median age 53 years, median body mass index 28 kg/m2 and median fasting plasma glucose 11.3 mmol/l, were recruited and treated initially by diet. Ninety five percent remained hyperglycaemic (fasting plasma glucose greater than 6 mmol/l) and were randomly allocated to different therapies. In the main randomisation, those who were asymptomatic and had fasting plasma glucose under 15 mmol/l were allocated either to diet policy, or to active policy with either insulin or sulphonylurea aiming to reduce the fasting plasma glucose to under 6 mmol/l. Over 3 years, the median fasting plasma glucose in those allocated to diet policy was 8.9 mmol/l compared with 7.0 mmol/l in those allocated to active policy. The Hypertension in Diabetes Study has been included in a factorial design to assess whether improved blood pressure control will be advantageous. Patients with blood pressure greater than or equal to 160/90 mm Hg were randomly allocated to tight control aiming for less than 150/85 mm Hg with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a Beta-blocker or to less tight control aiming for less than 200/105 mm Hg. The endpoints of the studies are major clinical events which affect the life and well-being of patients, such as heart attacks, angina, strokes, amputations, blindness and renal failure. To date, 728 patients have had at least one clinical endpoint. Surrogate endpoints include indices of macrovascular and microvascular disease detected by ECG with Minnesota Coding, retinal colour photography and microalbuminuria. The studies also aim to evaluate potential risk factors for the development of diabetic complications such as smoking, obesity, central adiposity, plasma LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, insulin, urate and other biochemical variables. The studies are planned to terminate in 1994, with a median follow-up of 9 years (range 3-16 years) for the glucose study and 5 years (range 2-6 years) for the hypertension study.

Indexed as

AdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diet, DiabeticHumansHypertensionMiddle AgedProspective StudiesResearch DesignUnited KingdomAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID1778353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.