Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17766364›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2007

Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients.

M De Gregori, R Ciccone, P Magini, T Pramparo, S Gimelli, J Messa, F Novara, A Vetro, E Rossi, P Maraschio and 33 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 355 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detection of a complex chromosomal rearrangement in a novel mouse mutant by optical genome mapping.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploration of Neurodegenerative Diseases Using Long-Read Sequencing and Optical Genome Mapping Technologies.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors at 19 institutions in 3 countries.

M De GregoriBiologia Generale e Genetica Medica, Universitè di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
R Ciccone
P Magini
T Pramparo
S Gimelli
J Messa
F Novara
A Vetro
E Rossi
P Maraschio
M C Bonaglia
C Anichini
G B Ferrero
M Silengo
E Fazzi
A Zatterale
R Fischetto
C Previderé
S Belli
A Turci
G Calabrese
F Bernardi
E Meneghelli
M Riegel
M Rocchi
S Guerneri
F Lalatta
L Zelante
C Romano
M Fichera
T Mattina
G Arrigo
M Zollino
S Giglio
F Lonardo
A Bonfante
A Ferlini
F Cifuentes
H Van Esch
L Backx
A Schinzel
J R Vermeesch
O Zuffardi
University of Pavia · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITOasi Maria SS · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Zurich · CHAgilent Technologies (United States) · USAzienda Ospedaliera G.Rummo · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITIRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITIstituto di Genetica Molecolare · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · ITOspedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

Telethon GGP05177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using array comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) 41 de novo reciprocal translocations and 18 de novo complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) were screened. All cases had been interpreted as "balanced" by conventional cytogenetics. In all, 27 cases of reciprocal translocations were detected in patients with an abnormal phenotype, and after array CGH analysis, 11 were found to be unbalanced. Thus 40% (11 of 27) of patients with a "chromosomal phenotype" and an apparently balanced translocation were in fact unbalanced, and 18% (5 of 27) of the reciprocal translocations were instead complex rearrangements with >3 breakpoints. Fourteen fetuses with de novo, apparently balanced translocations, all but two with normal ultrasound findings, were also analysed and all were found to be normal using array CGH. Thirteen CCRs were detected in patients with abnormal phenotypes, two in women who had experienced repeated spontaneous abortions and three in fetuses. Sixteen patients were found to have unbalanced mutations, with up to 4 deletions. These results suggest that genome-wide array CGH may be advisable in all carriers of "balanced" CCRs. The parental origin of the deletions was investigated in 5 reciprocal translocations and 11 CCRs; all were found to be paternal. Using customized platforms in seven cases of CCRs, the deletion breakpoints were narrowed down to regions of a few hundred base pairs in length. No susceptibility motifs were associated with the imbalances. These results show that the phenotypic abnormalities of apparently balanced de novo CCRs are mainly due to cryptic deletions and that spermatogenesis is more prone to generate multiple chaotic chromosome imbalances and reciprocal translocations than oogenesis.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionTranslocation, GeneticAbnormalities, MultipleAbortion, HabitualAdultChild, PreschoolChromosome BreakageChromosome DisordersChromosome PaintingFemaleFetal DiseasesHumansInfant, NewbornIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIntellectual DisabilityMale

Identifiers

PMID17766364
PMCPMC2652810
OpenAlexW2125419309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.