ArticleBMC health services research2007
Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems.
Article in BMC health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Guideline
- [Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2008Guideline
- Trial
- Covert Triage During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis of Rationing in Intensive Care.Chest · 2025Article
- Article
- Euterpe music therapy methodology and procedure algorithms.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Prioritizing patients for hip fracture surgery: the role of frailty and cardiac risk.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Priority-setting dilemmas, moral distress and support experienced by nurses and physicians in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway.Nursing ethics · 2021Article
- Perceived Impact of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Allocation Strategy: Health Professionals' Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges.World journal of surgery · 2018Review
- Their view: difficulties and challenges of patients and physicians in cross-cultural encounters and a medical ethics perspective.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- Next of kin's experiences of involvement during involuntary hospitalisation and coercion.BMC medical ethics · 2016Article
- A survey of Ethiopian physicians' experiences of bedside rationing: extensive resource scarcity, tough decisions and adverse consequences.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Patient outcomes vs. service workload: an analysis of outcomes in the burn service of England and Wales.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Inadequate treatment for elderly patients: professional norms and tight budgets could cause "ageism" in hospitals.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2014Article
- Avoiding bias in medical ethical decision-making. Lessons to be learnt from psychology research.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2011Review
- Health systems and sustainability: doctors and consumers differ on threats and solutions.PloS one · 2011Article
- Conservation of resources theory and research use in health systems.Implementation science : IS · 2010Article
- Pharmaceutical cost control in primary care: opinion and contributions by healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn response to limited resources, health care systems have adopted diverse cost-containment strategies and give priority to differing types of interventions. The perception of physicians, who witness the effects of these strategies, may provide useful insights regarding the impact of system-wide priority setting on access to care.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey to ascertain generalist physicians' perspectives on resources allocation and its consequences in Norway, Switzerland, Italy and the UK.
resultsSurvey respondents (N = 656, response rate 43%) ranged in age from 28-82, and averaged 25 years in practice. Most respondents (87.7%) perceived some resources as scarce, with the most restrictive being: access to nursing home, mental health services, referral to a specialist, and rehabilitation for stroke. Respondents attributed adverse outcomes to scarcity, and some respondents had encountered severe adverse events such as death or permanent disability. Despite universal coverage, 45.6% of respondents reported instances of underinsurance. Most respondents (78.7%) also reported some patient groups as more likely than others to be denied beneficial care on the basis of cost. Almost all respondents (97.3%) found at least one cost-containment policy acceptable. The types of policies preferred suggest that respondents are willing to participate in cost-containment, and do not want to be guided by administrative rules (11.2%) or restrictions on hospital beds (10.7%).
conclusionPhysician reports can provide an indication of how organizational factors may affect availability and equity of health care services. Physicians are willing to participate in cost-containment decisions, rather than be guided by administrative rules. Tools should be developed to enable physicians, who are in a unique position to observe unequal access or discrimination in their health care environment, to address these issues in a more targeted way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.