Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17764556›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2007

Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems.

Samia A Hurst, Reidun Forde, Stella Reiter-Theil, Anne-Marie Slowther, Arnaud Perrier, Renzo Pegoraro, Marion Danis

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inadequate treatment for elderly patients: professional norms and tight budgets could cause "ageism" in hospitals.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Samia A HurstInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, Geneva University Medical School, Switzerland.
Reidun Forde
Stella Reiter-Theil
Anne-Marie Slowther
Arnaud Perrier
Renzo Pegoraro
Marion Danis
Fondazione Lanza · ITInstitute for Biomedical Engineering · CHNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Oslo · NOWellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities · GB

Funding

Survey Of European Physicians Regarding Ethical DilemmasZ01CL010518 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI DANIS, MARION · 2002 to 2008
$17k
A Survey Of Physicians Regarding Ethical Dilemmas In Clinical PracticeZIACL010518 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI DANIS, MARION · 2009 to 2021
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to limited resources, health care systems have adopted diverse cost-containment strategies and give priority to differing types of interventions. The perception of physicians, who witness the effects of these strategies, may provide useful insights regarding the impact of system-wide priority setting on access to care.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey to ascertain generalist physicians' perspectives on resources allocation and its consequences in Norway, Switzerland, Italy and the UK.

resultsSurvey respondents (N = 656, response rate 43%) ranged in age from 28-82, and averaged 25 years in practice. Most respondents (87.7%) perceived some resources as scarce, with the most restrictive being: access to nursing home, mental health services, referral to a specialist, and rehabilitation for stroke. Respondents attributed adverse outcomes to scarcity, and some respondents had encountered severe adverse events such as death or permanent disability. Despite universal coverage, 45.6% of respondents reported instances of underinsurance. Most respondents (78.7%) also reported some patient groups as more likely than others to be denied beneficial care on the basis of cost. Almost all respondents (97.3%) found at least one cost-containment policy acceptable. The types of policies preferred suggest that respondents are willing to participate in cost-containment, and do not want to be guided by administrative rules (11.2%) or restrictions on hospital beds (10.7%).

conclusionPhysician reports can provide an indication of how organizational factors may affect availability and equity of health care services. Physicians are willing to participate in cost-containment decisions, rather than be guided by administrative rules. Tools should be developed to enable physicians, who are in a unique position to observe unequal access or discrimination in their health care environment, to address these issues in a more targeted way.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSocial PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost ControlCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care RationingHealth Care SurveysHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNorway

Identifiers

PMID17764556
PMCPMC1995213
OpenAlexW1966755652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.