Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17763864›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2008

Triplex configuration in the nick-free DNAs that constitute the chromosomal scaffolds in grasshopper spermatids.

Adriana Cerná, Carmen López-Fernández, José Luis Fernández, Susana Moreno Díaz de la Espina, Consuelo de la Torre, Jaime Gosálvez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Thiazole Orange as an Alternative to Antibody Binding for Detecting Triple-helical DNA in Heterochromatin of Drosophila and Rhynchosciara.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2018
    Article
  5. Potential sites of triple-helical nucleic acid formation in chromosomes of Rhynchosciara (Diptera: Sciaridae) and Drosophila melanogaster.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana CernáCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu, 9, Madrid, 8040, Spain.
Carmen López-Fernández
José Luis Fernández
Susana Moreno Díaz de la Espina
Consuelo de la Torre
Jaime Gosálvez
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESCentro Oncológico de Galicia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After applying proper deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) probes, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that the 8/9 centromeres-one per chromatid of the male haploid complement (X0) of Pyrgomorpha conica grasshopper-colocalized at the spermatid blunt end, where the spermatozoa flagellum inserts. A bundle of aligned 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-positive chromatid scaffolds, which formed the central spermatid core, was observed after DNA breakage detection followed by FISH. Modular nature of scaffold DNA was occasionally evident. The technique also showed that in the early spermatid, the chromatid scaffolds lacked any DNA nick, whereas abundant breaks accumulated in the surrounding loops. Moreover, immunodetection showed that scaffold DNA participated in the formation of triplex DNA, while this configuration was absent from the loops. During spermatid maturation, triplex DNA disappeared from the scaffold in parallel with loop retraction, while protamines replace histones. Thus, the presence of triplex DNA in the chromatid scaffold correlates with the anchoring of expanded DNA loops to it. After loop retraction, the scaffolds of all chromatids coiled as a single unit in the spermatid head. This cooperative coiling produced enlargement and tilting of the distal telomeric signals, which were distributed along the spermatid head according to the length of each chromosome. We propose that specific DNA sequences dispersed throughout the whole chromatid fold forward and backward coaxially to chromatid length, forming individual scaffold modules whose linear assembly accounts for the minimum length of each individual chromatid. Finally, the core of the grasshopper male spermatid should be considered as a single chromosome in which the DNA scaffolds of the whole set of the nonhomologous chromosomes of the haploid complement are interconnected. This pattern of chromatin organization applies probably to other elongated spermatids.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentromereChromatinChromosome BreakageChromosomesDNADNA DamageFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGrasshoppersIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleNuclear MatrixProtaminesSpermatidsSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaChromatinDNAProtamines

Identifiers

PMID17763864
OpenAlexW1991987835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.