Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007
Patients' experiences of screening for type 2 diabetes: prospective qualitative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Placing assistive technology and telecare in everyday practices of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from an embedded ethnography of a national dementia trial.BMC geriatrics · 2021Trial
- ForgIng New paths in DIabetes PrevenTion (FINDIT): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Trials · 2017Trial
- Change in cardio-protective medication and health-related quality of life after diagnosis of screen-detected diabetes: Results from the ADDITION-Cambridge cohort.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2015Trial
- Trial
- More than measurement: practice team experiences of screening for type 2 diabetes.Family practice · 2010Trial
- Are people with negative diabetes screening tests falsely reassured? Parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Trial
- Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Trial
- How Did People with Prediabetes Who Attended the Diabetes Prevention Education Program (DiPEP) Experience Making Lifestyle Changes? A Qualitative Study in Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Preventive health examinations: protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study of German employees aged 45 to 59 years (Ü45-check).Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Early detection of type 2 diabetes in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Stockholm - comparing reach of community and facility-based screening.Global health action · 2020Article
- Article
- Qualitative study investigating the perceptions of parents of children who failed vision screening at the age of 4-5 years.BMJ paediatrics open · 2018Article
- Article
- Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Article
- Exploring lifestyle and risk in preventing type 2 diabetes-a nested qualitative study of older participants in a lifestyle intervention program (VEND-RISK).BMC public health · 2016Article
- GPs' perspectives on managing the NHS Health Check in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of implementation in one area of England.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Mixed methods study of engagement in behaviors to prevent type 2 diabetes among employees with pre-diabetes.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2016Article
- Be SMART: examining the experience of implementing the NHS Health Check in UK primary care.BMC family practice · 2015Article
- Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients' experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening.BMJ open · 2014Article
- Health literacy, self-efficacy, food label use, and diet in young adults.American journal of health behavior · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo provide insight into factors that contribute to the anxiety reported in a quantitative study of the psychological effect of screening for type 2 diabetes. To explore expectations of and reactions to the screening experience of patients with positive, negative, and intermediate results.
designProspective qualitative interview study of patients attending a screening programme for type 2 diabetes.
settingSeven general practices in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England.
participants23 participants (aged 50-69) attending different stages in the screening process.
resultsParticipants' perceptions changed as they progressed through the screening programme; the stepwise process seemed to help them adjust psychologically. The first screening test was typically considered unimportant and was attended with no thought about its implications. By the final diagnostic test, type 2 diabetes was considered a strong possibility, albeit a "mild" form. After diagnosis, people with screen detected type 2 diabetes tended to downplay its importance and talked confidently about their plans to control it. Participants with intermediate results seemed uncertain about their diagnosis, and those who screened negative were largely unaware of their remaining high risk.
conclusionsThis study helps in understanding the limited psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes quantified previously, in particular by the quantitative substudy of ADDITION (Cambridge). The findings have implications for implementing such a screening programme in terms of timing and content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.