ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2007
Depression and CHD risk: how should we intervene?
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular Care in Women Veterans: An Updated Profile.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Depressive symptoms effect on self care behavior during the first month after myocardial infarction.Global journal of health science · 2015Article
- Psychological factors are important correlates of dietary pattern in overweight adults.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is common in the community and is a risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). In patients with CHD, the prevalence of major depression is nearly 20% and the prevalence of minor depressive disorder is approximately 27%. When present in patients with existing CHD, depression is independently associated with worse outcome, including higher morbidity and mortality, and worse health status. Observational studies suggest that use of antidepressant medications in patients with CHD is associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular events. However, only one randomized controlled trial, the ENRICHD (Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease) study, was designed to evaluate whether treatment of depression in patients with CHD can improve cardiac prognosis. Although the study showed that cognitive behavior therapy was better than usual care in improving depression, there was no improvement in all-cause mortality or recurrent cardiac events. There have been no clinical trials specifically designed to evaluate whether pharmacologic treatment of depression improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CHD. Thus, there is a clear need for additional trials testing interventions to improve cardiac prognosis based on treatment of depression. In the meantime, depression remains an important illness in its own right and deserves treatment. Safe and effective treatments of depression in patients with CHD include cognitive behavior therapy and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.