Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17761000›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2007

Modeling gene expression regulatory networks with the sparse vector autoregressive model.

André Fujita, João R Sato, Humberto M Garay-Malpartida, Rui Yamaguchi, Satoru Miyano, Mari C Sogayar, Carlos E Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Time-Varying Gene Regulatory Networks Inference Using KL Divergence from Single Cell Data.Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Significance of event related causality (ERC) in eloquent neural networks.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Granger causal inference on DAGs identifies genomic loci regulating transcription.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2022
    Article
  12. Granger Causality: A Review and Recent Advances.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Two dynamic regimes in the human gut microbiome.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

André FujitaInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 1010 - São Paulo, 05508-090, SP, Brazil. fujita@ime.usp.br
João R Sato
Humberto M Garay-Malpartida
Rui Yamaguchi
Satoru Miyano
Mari C Sogayar
Carlos E Ferreira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo understand the molecular mechanisms underlying important biological processes, a detailed description of the gene products networks involved is required. In order to define and understand such molecular networks, some statistical methods are proposed in the literature to estimate gene regulatory networks from time-series microarray data. However, several problems still need to be overcome. Firstly, information flow need to be inferred, in addition to the correlation between genes. Secondly, we usually try to identify large networks from a large number of genes (parameters) originating from a smaller number of microarray experiments (samples). Due to this situation, which is rather frequent in Bioinformatics, it is difficult to perform statistical tests using methods that model large gene-gene networks. In addition, most of the models are based on dimension reduction using clustering techniques, therefore, the resulting network is not a gene-gene network but a module-module network. Here, we present the Sparse Vector Autoregressive model as a solution to these problems.

resultsWe have applied the Sparse Vector Autoregressive model to estimate gene regulatory networks based on gene expression profiles obtained from time-series microarray experiments. Through extensive simulations, by applying the SVAR method to artificial regulatory networks, we show that SVAR can infer true positive edges even under conditions in which the number of samples is smaller than the number of genes. Moreover, it is possible to control for false positives, a significant advantage when compared to other methods described in the literature, which are based on ranks or score functions. By applying SVAR to actual HeLa cell cycle gene expression data, we were able to identify well known transcription factor targets.

conclusionThe proposed SVAR method is able to model gene regulatory networks in frequent situations in which the number of samples is lower than the number of genes, making it possible to naturally infer partial Granger causalities without any a priori information. In addition, we present a statistical test to control the false discovery rate, which was not previously possible using other gene regulatory network models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticFalse Positive ReactionsGene Expression ProfilingHeLa CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID17761000
PMCPMC2048982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.