ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2007
Phylogenomic analysis of natural selection pressure in Streptococcus genomes.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positive selection at core genes may underlie niche adaptation in Fusobacterium animalis.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- Multilocus sequence analysis reveals genetic diversity in Staphylococcus aureus isolate of goat with mastitis persistent after treatment with enrofloxacin.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Phenotype and multi-omics comparison of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus uncovers pathogenic traits and predicts zoonotic potential.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Evolutionary patterns of chimeric retrogenes in Oryza species.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Genomics of the Genus Bifidobacterium Reveals Species-Specific Adaptation to the Glycan-Rich Gut Environment.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Review
- POTION: an end-to-end pipeline for positive Darwinian selection detection in genome-scale data through phylogenetic comparison of protein-coding genes.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Streptococcus thermophilus Biofilm Formation: A Remnant Trait of Ancestral Commensal Life?PloS one · 2015Article
- Transcriptomic characterization of the immunogenetic repertoires of heteromyid rodents.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Investigation of the evolutionary development of the genus Bifidobacterium by comparative genomics.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014Article
- Molecular analysis of ancient caries.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014Article
- Insight into the evolution of the histidine triad protein (HTP) family in Streptococcus.PloS one · 2013Article
- An efficient method for mining cross-timepoint gene regulation sequential patterns from time course gene expression datasets.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Genome evolution and phylogenomic analysis of Candidatus Kinetoplastibacterium, the betaproteobacterial endosymbionts of Strigomonas and Angomonas.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Directional evolution of Chlamydia trachomatis towards niche-specific adaptation.Journal of bacteriology · 2012Article
- Replacing and additive horizontal gene transfer in Streptococcus.Molecular biology and evolution · 2012Article
- Developing insights into the mechanisms of evolution of bacterial pathogens from whole-genome sequences.Future microbiology · 2012Review
- Functional bias of positively selected genes in Streptococcus genomes.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2012Article
- Comparative genomics of Mycoplasma: analysis of conserved essential genes and diversity of the pan-genome.PloS one · 2012Article
- High sensitivity to aligner and high rate of false positives in the estimates of positive selection in the 12 Drosophila genomes.Genome research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn comparative analyses of bacterial pathogens, it has been common practice to discriminate between two types of genes: (i) those shared by pathogens and their non-pathogenic relatives (core genes), and (ii) those found exclusively in pathogens (pathogen-specific accessory genes). Rather than attempting to a priori delineate genes into sets more or less relevant to pathogenicity, we took a broad approach to the analysis of Streptococcus species by investigating the strength of natural selection in all clusters of homologous genes. The genus Streptococcus is comprised of a wide variety of both pathogenic and commensal lineages, and we relate our findings to the pre-existing knowledge of Streptococcus virulence factors.
resultsOur analysis of 1730 gene clusters revealed 136 cases of positive Darwinian selection, which we suggest is most likely to result from an antagonistic interaction between the host and pathogen at the molecular level. A two-step validation procedure suggests that positive selection was robustly identified in our genomic survey. We found no evidence to support the notion that pathogen specific accessory genes are more likely to be subject to positive selection than core genes. Indeed, we even uncovered a few cases of essential gene evolution by positive selection. Among the gene clusters subject to positive selection, a large fraction (29%) can be connected to virulence. The most striking finding was that a considerable fraction of the positively selected genes are also known to have tissue specific patterns of expression during invasive disease. As current expression data is far from comprehensive, we suggest that this fraction was underestimated.
conclusionOur findings suggest that pathogen specific genes, although a popular focus of research, do not provide a complete picture of the evolutionary dynamics of virulence. The results of this study, and others, support the notion that the products of both core and accessory genes participate in complex networks that comprise the molecular basis of virulence. Future work should seek to understand the evolutionary dynamics of both core and accessory genes as a function of the networks in which they participate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.