Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1773551›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics1991

Bioinequivalence of four 100 mg oral aspirin formulations in healthy volunteers.

F Bochner, A A Somogyi, K M Wilson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Original brands and generic preparations].Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983) · 2000
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F BochnerDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
A A Somogyi
K M Wilson
University of Adelaide · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The single dose pharmacokinetics of 4 commercially available 100 mg oral aspirin formulations were studied in 6 healthy men and 6 healthy women. Two of the formulations were rapid release ('Cardiprin' 100, 'Platelin') and the other 2 were enteric coated formulations ('Astrix' 100, 'Cartia'). There were marked differences in the plasma concentration-time profiles between the rapid release and the enteric coated formulations. There were no significant differences (p greater than 0.05) in the mean time to achieve maximum aspirin concentrations between 'Cardiprin' 100 (0.48 h) and 'Platelin' (0.35 h), but this was significantly prolonged (p less than 0.001) for 'Astrix' 100 (3.73 h) and even more prolonged for 'Cartia' (6.84 h). Similar between-formulation differences were seen in the areas under the plasma concentration-time curves, for which the rank order was 'Cardiprin' 100 (1.60 mg/L.h) = 'Platelin' (1.54 mg/L.h) greater than 'Astrix' 100 (0.73 mg/L.h) greater than 'Cartia' (0.56 mg/L.h). For 'Cardiprin' 100, 'Platelin' and 'Astrix' 100 plasma aspirin concentrations were below 5 micrograms/L by 7 h after ingestion, whereas for 'Cartia' aspirin was detectable for up to 16 h, giving the appearance of sustained release. The enteric coated formulations produced the greatest variability in the plasma aspirin concentration vs time profiles. The urinary recovery of salicylate was greater than 80% of the administered dose for all 4 formulations. The clinical significance of the marked pharmacokinetic differences observed with these 4 low-dose aspirin formulations is not known.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAspirinChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDelayed-Action PreparationsDosage FormsFemaleHalf-LifeHumansMaleTherapeutic EquivalencyAspirinDelayed-Action PreparationsDosage Forms

Identifiers

PMID1773551
OpenAlexW2137532808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.