Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17728475›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Comparison between O serotyping method and multiplex real-time PCR to identify diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Taiwan.

Ji-Rong Yang, Fang-Tzy Wu, Jin-Lai Tsai, Jung-Jung Mu, Ling-Fen Lin, Kuang-Lo Chen, Steve Hsu-Sung Kuo, Chuen-Sheue Chiang, Ho-Sheng Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occurrence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli genes in raw water of water treatment plants.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ji-Rong YangResearch and Diagnostic Center, Centers for Disease Control, 161, Kunyang Street, Taipei, Taiwan.
Fang-Tzy Wu
Jin-Lai Tsai
Jung-Jung Mu
Ling-Fen Lin
Kuang-Lo Chen
Steve Hsu-Sung Kuo
Chuen-Sheue Chiang
Ho-Sheng Wu

Funding

VELOCARDIOFACIAL SYNDROME--MOLECULAR &CLINICAL STUDIESP01DC002027 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA · PI EMANUEL, BEVERLY S · 1994 to 2003
$6.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS P01 DC002027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) identifications obtained between traditional O serotyping and modern virulence gene detection assays, we developed a multiplex real-time PCR assay by detecting six specific virulence genes for enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC). Among 261 clinical diarrheal stool samples, a total of 137 suspected DEC (sDEC) isolates were identified by the use of commercially available antisera. The most prevalent serogroups were O1 (12/137; 8.7%), O25 (9/137; 6.5%), and O44 (9/137; 6.5%). The specific virulence genes for the 137 sDEC isolates were analyzed by the multiplex real-time PCR assay. Fifteen (10.9%) of 137 isolates were confirmed to be true DEC strains, indicating that the serotypic markers did not correlate with the specific virulence genes. ETEC (66.7%) was the most prevalent, followed by EIEC (20%) and EPEC (13.3%). No EHEC strains were identified in the specimens. Four novel serotypes were found in the study: two in EPEC strains (O111:H9 and O63:H6) and two in EIEC strains (O63:H9 and O169:H9). In conclusion, the real-time PCR assay considerably reduces the high false-positive rate from the use of serotyping alone, and thus, it is suggested that serogrouping-based methods are inadequate for the identification of DEC isolates, although they are useful for the identification of a limited number of serogroups. In addition, ETEC, EPEC, and EIEC strains were present in 5.7% (15/261) of the diarrheal patients in northern Taiwan in 2006.

Indexed as

DiarrheaEnterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliEnteropathogenic Escherichia coliEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coliO AntigensPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySerotypingVirulenceO Antigens

Identifiers

PMID17728475
PMCPMC2168529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.