ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007
Comparison between O serotyping method and multiplex real-time PCR to identify diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal sludge and adjacent drinking water as reservoirs of multidrug resistant ESBL-producing pathogenic Escherichia coli in Rohingya Camps, Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Virulence-determinants and antibiotic-resistance genes of MDR-E. coli isolated from secondary infections following FMD-outbreak in cattle.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Human Mucosal IgA Immune Responses against EnterotoxigenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Molecular Epidemiology of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-ProducingInfectious diseases · 2017Article
- Etiology and Risk Factors of Acute Gastroenteritis in a Taipei Emergency Department: Clinical Features for Bacterial Gastroenteritis.Journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Monoclonal antibodies against all known variants of EspA: development of a simple diagnostic test for enteropathogenic Escherichia coli based on a key virulence factor.Journal of medical microbiology · 2014Article
- Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli using a two-system multiplex-PCR protocol.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2013Article
- Article
- Occurrence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli genes in raw water of water treatment plants.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2011Article
- Foreign travel is a major risk factor for colonization with Escherichia coli producing CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a prospective study with Swedish volunteers.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2010Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strains in Tehran, Iran.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2010Article
- Travelers' diarrhea: an update on susceptibility, prevention, and treatment.Current gastroenterology reports · 2008Article
- Molecular serotyping of diarrheagenicGut microbesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare the diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) identifications obtained between traditional O serotyping and modern virulence gene detection assays, we developed a multiplex real-time PCR assay by detecting six specific virulence genes for enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC). Among 261 clinical diarrheal stool samples, a total of 137 suspected DEC (sDEC) isolates were identified by the use of commercially available antisera. The most prevalent serogroups were O1 (12/137; 8.7%), O25 (9/137; 6.5%), and O44 (9/137; 6.5%). The specific virulence genes for the 137 sDEC isolates were analyzed by the multiplex real-time PCR assay. Fifteen (10.9%) of 137 isolates were confirmed to be true DEC strains, indicating that the serotypic markers did not correlate with the specific virulence genes. ETEC (66.7%) was the most prevalent, followed by EIEC (20%) and EPEC (13.3%). No EHEC strains were identified in the specimens. Four novel serotypes were found in the study: two in EPEC strains (O111:H9 and O63:H6) and two in EIEC strains (O63:H9 and O169:H9). In conclusion, the real-time PCR assay considerably reduces the high false-positive rate from the use of serotyping alone, and thus, it is suggested that serogrouping-based methods are inadequate for the identification of DEC isolates, although they are useful for the identification of a limited number of serogroups. In addition, ETEC, EPEC, and EIEC strains were present in 5.7% (15/261) of the diarrheal patients in northern Taiwan in 2006.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.