Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17727745›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007

Validation of a clinical rule to predict complications of acute cough in preschool children: a prospective study in primary care.

Alastair D Hay, Catharine Gorst, Alan Montgomery, Tim J Peters, Tom Fahey

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. The case of 'protective fever and chest signs': towards a better understanding of general practice databases.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alastair D HayAcademic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol. alastair.hay@bristol.ac.uk
Catharine Gorst
Alan Montgomery
Tim J Peters
Tom Fahey
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew clinical rules have been derived let alone validated in primary care. A rule was derived to predict complications of acute cough in preschool children presenting to primary care. The clinical rule used the presence/absence of fever and/or chest signs to distinguish children at low, medium, and high risk of complications.

aimTo validate a clinical rule for predicting complications of acute cough in preschool children in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective cohort study.

settingThirteen general practices in Bristol and Tayside, UK.

methodPreschool children with cough up to 28 days and without asthma were recruited. The same sociodemographic, clinical history, examination, and complications data as for the derivation study were collected. First, univariable logistic regression was used to explore the associations with complications, and then predictors with stronger relationships (P<0.2) were modelled using multivariable logistic regression. These predictors were compared with derivation predictors with respect to their strength of association with complications. The derivation predictors were used in the validation dataset to allow comparison of the post-test probabilities of complications between derivation and validation studies.

resultsThe presence of fever and chest signs in the validation study tended to be protective for complications, with univariable odds ratios (ORs) of 0.37 and 0.81 respectively, compared with ORs of 4.86 and 2.72 in the derivation study. However, 95% confidence limits were wide and evidence for two other possible reasons for these results were found: spectrum bias and confounding by indication.

conclusionNo evidence was found to validate the clinical rule for predicting complications of acute cough, possibly as a result of spectrum bias, confounding by indication, and/or chance. As paediatric infectious illness is costly and associated with high rates of antibiotic use, further research is needed to derive and validate prediction rules.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCoughData CollectionDisease ProgressionEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleFeverHumansInfantMaleMultivariate AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID17727745
PMCPMC2099635
OpenAlexW2112605647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.