The Quality and Outcomes Framework: too early for a final verdict.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Medical ethics: enhanced or undermined by modes of payment?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
   Article
2. Physical health indicators in major mental illness: analysis of QOF data across UK general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
   Article
3. Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
   Article
4. Assessing the acceptability of quality indicators and linkages to payment in primary care in nova scotia.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2011
   Article
5. The role of primary care in the recognition of and response to dementia.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2010
   Article
6. End-of-life care for patients with COPD in the community setting.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
   Article
7. Welcome to the ethics section of the London Journal of Primary Care.London journal of primary care · 2008
   Article
8. Measuring performance quality in general practice: is international harmonization desirable?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
   Article
9. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities.Annals of family medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as