Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17722986›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2007

Linkage disequilibrium in wild mice.

Cathy C Laurie, Deborah A Nickerson, Amy D Anderson, Bruce S Weir, Robert J Livingston, Matthew D Dean, Kimberly L Smith, Eric E Schadt, Michael W Nachman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cathy C LaurieDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Deborah A Nickerson
Amy D Anderson
Bruce S Weir
Robert J Livingston
Matthew D Dean
Kimberly L Smith
Eric E Schadt
Michael W Nachman

Funding

UW-FHCRC VARIATION DISCOVERY RESOURCEU01HL066682 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NICKERSON, DEBORAH A · 2000 to 2007
$19.1M
Theoretical Population Genetics SupplementR01GM075091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEIR, BRUCE S. · 2006 to 2020
$4.7M
Natural selection and DNA sequence variation in MusR01GM074245 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NACHMAN, MICHAEL W. · 2005 to 2015
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL66682NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL066682NIGMS NIH HHS GM074245NIGMS NIH HHS GM075091NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074245NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crosses between laboratory strains of mice provide a powerful way of detecting quantitative trait loci for complex traits related to human disease. Hundreds of these loci have been detected, but only a small number of the underlying causative genes have been identified. The main difficulty is the extensive linkage disequilibrium (LD) in intercross progeny and the slow process of fine-scale mapping by traditional methods. Recently, new approaches have been introduced, such as association studies with inbred lines and multigenerational crosses. These approaches are very useful for interval reduction, but generally do not provide single-gene resolution because of strong LD extending over one to several megabases. Here, we investigate the genetic structure of a natural population of mice in Arizona to determine its suitability for fine-scale LD mapping and association studies. There are three main findings: (1) Arizona mice have a high level of genetic variation, which includes a large fraction of the sequence variation present in classical strains of laboratory mice; (2) they show clear evidence of local inbreeding but appear to lack stable population structure across the study area; and (3) LD decays with distance at a rate similar to human populations, which is considerably more rapid than in laboratory populations of mice. Strong associations in Arizona mice are limited primarily to markers less than 100 kb apart, which provides the possibility of fine-scale association mapping at the level of one or a few genes. Although other considerations, such as sample size requirements and marker discovery, are serious issues in the implementation of association studies, the genetic variation and LD results indicate that wild mice could provide a useful tool for identifying genes that cause variation in complex traits.

Indexed as

Linkage DisequilibriumAnimalsAnimals, WildArizonaGenetic VariationMiceMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID17722986
PMCPMC1950958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.