Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17722977›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2007

V3 loop truncations in HIV-1 envelope impart resistance to coreceptor inhibitors and enhanced sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies.

Meg M Laakso, Fang-Hua Lee, Beth Haggarty, Caroline Agrawal, Katrina M Nolan, Mark Biscone, Josephine Romano, Andrea P O Jordan, George J Leslie, Eric G Meissner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meg M LaaksoDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Fang-Hua Lee
Beth Haggarty
Caroline Agrawal
Katrina M Nolan
Mark Biscone
Josephine Romano
Andrea P O Jordan
George J Leslie
Eric G Meissner
Lishan Su
James A Hoxie
Robert W Doms
University of Pennsylvania · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

TRAINING IN HIV PATHOGENESIST32AI007632 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Frederic D Bushman, James L. Riley · 2000 to 2026
$10.6M
HIV entry and its inhibitionR01AI040880 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOMS, ROBERT W. · 1997 to 2010
$4.2M
HIV-1 Replication and Pathogenesis in the Human ThymusR01AI041356 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SU, LISHAN · 1998 to 2007
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI040880NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI041356NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI457800NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007632PHS HHS P30-A150410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The V1/V2 region and the V3 loop of the human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) envelope (Env) protein are targets for neutralizing antibodies and also play an important functional role, with the V3 loop largely determining whether a virus uses CCR5 (R5), CXCR4 (X4), or either coreceptor (R5X4) to infect cells. While the sequence of V3 is variable, its length is highly conserved. Structural studies indicate that V3 length may be important for interactions with the extracellular loops of the coreceptor. Consistent with this view, genetic truncation of the V3 loop is typically associated with loss of Env function. We removed approximately one-half of the V3 loop from three different HIV-1 strains, and found that only the Env protein from the R5X4 strain R3A retained some fusion activity. Loss of V1/V2 (DeltaV1/V2) was well tolerated by this virus. Passaging of virus with the truncated V3 loop resulted in the derivation of a virus strain that replicated with wild-type kinetics. This virus, termed TA1, retained the V3 loop truncation and acquired several adaptive changes in gp120 and gp41. TA1 could use CCR5 but not CXCR4 to infect cells, and was extremely sensitive to neutralization by HIV-1 positive human sera, and by antibodies to the CD4 binding site and to CD4-induced epitopes in the bridging sheet region of gp120. In addition, TA1 was completely resistant to CCR5 inhibitors, and was more dependent upon the N-terminal domain of CCR5, a region of the receptor that is thought to contact the bridging sheet of gp120 and the base of the V3 loop, and whose conformation may not be greatly affected by CCR5 inhibitors. These studies suggest that the V3 loop protects HIV from neutralization by antibodies prevalent in infected humans, that CCR5 inhibitors likely act by disrupting interactions between the V3 loop and the coreceptor, and that altered use of CCR5 by HIV-1 associated with increased sensitivity to changes in the N-terminal domain can be linked to high levels of resistance to these antiviral compounds.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCell LineHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Fusion InhibitorsHumansMolecular Sequence DataNeutralization TestsPeptide FragmentsReceptors, CCR5Receptors, ChemokineReceptors, HIVVirus ReplicationHIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV envelope protein gp120 (305-321)HIV Fusion InhibitorsPeptide FragmentsReceptors, CCR5Receptors, ChemokineReceptors, HIV

Identifiers

PMID17722977
PMCPMC1950945
OpenAlexW2046372454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.