Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17721782›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2008

Toward the harmonization of immune monitoring in clinical trials: quo vadis?

C M Britten, S Janetzki, S H van der Burg, C Gouttefangeas, A Hoos

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Beyond tumor biology: nursing interventions for psychological and immune health in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ancillary study management systems: a review of needs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Review
  18. Response definition criteria for ELISPOT assays revisited.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2010
    Article
  19. Improved endpoints for cancer immunotherapy trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2010
    Review
  20. New approaches to design HIV-1 T-cell vaccines.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C M BrittenDepartment of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. cebritten@web.de
S Janetzki
S H van der Burg
C Gouttefangeas
A Hoos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyClinical Trials as TopicHumansMonitoring, ImmunologicNeoplasmsPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID17721782
PMCPMC2150641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.