ArticleGenetics2007
Genetic and haplotypic structure in 14 European and African cattle breeds.
Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterosis in cattle crossbreeding schemes in tropical regions: meta-analysis of effects of breed combination, trait type, and climate on level of heterosis.Journal of animal science · 2019Pooled it
- Unscrambling the history of African indicine cattle genomes.iScience · 2026Article
- Adaptive introgression shaping genomic adaptation and ancestral mosaicism of Changthangi sheep for high-altitude survival and pashmina excellence.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide SNP evidence for the genetic uniqueness of indigenous cattle population.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- The genetic diversity of Indonesian cattle has been shaped by multiple introductions and adaptive introgression.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evaluation of genomic selection models using whole genome sequence data and functional annotation in Belgian Blue cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Evaluation of heritability partitioning approaches in livestock populations.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Exploring the Effects of Robertsonian Translocation 1/29 (Rob (1;29)) on Genetic Diversity in Minor Breeds of Spanish Berrenda Cattle via Genome-Wide Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Meat Quality in Katerini and Podolian Young Bulls Raised on Pasture: A Comparison between Organic Production Systems in Greek and Italian Environments.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- New Insights on Nucleotide Sequence Variants and mRNA Levels of Candidate Genes Assessing Resistance/Susceptibility to Mastitis in Holstein and Montbéliarde Dairy Cows.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, Gene Expression and Economic Evaluation of Parameters Associated with Mastitis Susceptibility in European Cattle Breeds.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- The genetic history of Mayotte and Madagascar cattle breeds mirrors the complex pattern of human exchanges in Western Indian Ocean.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Benchmarking phasing software with a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Linkage Disequilibrium and Effective Population Size of Buffalo Populations of Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, and Egypt Using a Medium Density SNP Array.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium and Effective Population Size in Three Italian Autochthonous Beef Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Genetic diversity and relationships among three Southern African Nguni cattle populations.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Article
- Whole genome detection of recent selection signatures in Sarabi cattle: a unique Iranian taurine breed.Genes & genomics · 2020Article
- Linkage Disequilibrium, Effective Population Size and Genomic Inbreeding Rates in American Mink Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Genetic Connectedness Between Norwegian White Sheep and New Zealand Composite Sheep Populations With Similar Development History.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate and compare the extent of LD in cattle, 1536 SNPs, mostly localized on BTA03, were detected in silico from available sequence data using two different methods and genotyped on samples from 14 distinct breeds originating from Europe and Africa. Only 696 SNPs could be validated, confirming the importance of trace-quality information for the in silico detection. Most of the validated SNPs were informative in several breeds and were used for a detailed description of their genetic structure and relationships. Results obtained were in agreement with previous studies performed on microsatellite markers and using larger samples. In addition, the majority of the validated SNPs could be mapped precisely, reaching an average density of one marker every 311 kb. This allowed us to analyze the extent of LD in the different breeds. Decrease of LD with physical distance across breeds revealed footprints of ancestral LD at short distances (<10 kb). As suggested by the haplotype block structure, these ancestral blocks are organized, within a breed, into larger blocks of a few hundred kilobases. In practice, such a structure similar to that already reported in dogs makes it possible to develop a chip of <300,000 SNPs, which should be efficient for mapping purposes in most cattle breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.