Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17720834›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2007

Comparison of direct genome restriction enzyme analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing of Vibrio vulnificus and their correspondence with multilocus sequence typing data.

Narjol González-Escalona, Brooke Whitney, Lee-Ann Jaykus, Angelo DePaola

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ecological diversification reveals routes of pathogen emergence in endemicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genotypic Characterization of Vibrio vulnificus Clinical Isolates in Korea.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Narjol González-EscalonaDepartment of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. narjol@gmail.com.
Brooke Whitney
Lee-Ann Jaykus
Angelo DePaola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the potential of direct genome restriction enzyme analysis (DGREA) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for discriminating Vibrio vulnificus isolates from clinical (23) and environmental (17) sources. The genotypes generated by both methodologies were compared to previous multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data. DGREA established clearer relationships among V. vulnificus strains and was more consistent with MLST than with PFGE. DGREA is a very promising tool for epidemiological and ecological studies of V. vulnificus.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenome, BacterialHumansPhylogenyReproducibility of ResultsRestriction MappingVibrio vulnificusDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID17720834
PMCPMC2168220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.