Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17718920›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2007

Comparison of cooling methods to induce and maintain normo- and hypothermia in intensive care unit patients: a prospective intervention study.

Cornelia W Hoedemaekers, Mustapha Ezzahti, Aico Gerritsen, Johannes G van der Hoeven

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Modest cooling therapies (35ºC to 37.5ºC) for traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Temperature control in sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cornelia W HoedemaekersDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. C.Hoedemaekers@ic.umcn.nl
Mustapha Ezzahti
Aico Gerritsen
Johannes G van der Hoeven

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTemperature management is used with increased frequency as a tool to mitigate neurological injury. Although frequently used, little is known about the optimal cooling methods for inducing and maintaining controlled normo- and hypothermia in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study we compared the efficacy of several commercially available cooling devices for temperature management in ICU patients with various types of neurological injury.

methodsFifty adult ICU patients with an indication for controlled mild hypothermia or strict normothermia were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients in each group were assigned in consecutive order to conventional cooling (that is, rapid infusion of 30 ml/kg cold fluids, ice and/or coldpacks), cooling with water circulating blankets, air circulating blankets, water circulating gel-coated pads and an intravascular heat exchange system. In all patients the speed of cooling (expressed as degrees C/h) was measured. After the target temperature was reached, we measured the percentage of time the patient's temperature was 0.2 degrees C below or above the target range. Rates of temperature decline over time were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance. Differences between groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsTemperature decline was significantly higher with the water-circulating blankets (1.33 +/- 0.63 degrees C/h), gel-pads (1.04 +/- 0.14 degrees C/h) and intravascular cooling (1.46 +/- 0.42 degrees C/h) compared to conventional cooling (0.31 +/- 0.23 degrees C/h) and the air-circulating blankets (0.18 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h) (p < 0.01). After the target temperature was reached, the intravascular cooling device was 11.2 +/- 18.7% of the time out of range, which was significantly less compared to all other methods.

conclusionCooling with water-circulating blankets, gel-pads and intravascular cooling is more efficient compared to conventional cooling and air-circulating blankets. The intravascular cooling system is most reliable to maintain a stable temperature.

Indexed as

AgedArrhythmias, CardiacBrain InjuriesCritical CareFemaleFeverHeart ArrestHumansHypotensionHypothermia, InducedMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSubarachnoid Hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID17718920
PMCPMC2206487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.