ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2007
The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation in vivo.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020Review
- Conventional, Bayesian, and Modified Prony's methods for characterizing fast and slow waves in equine cancellous bone.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015Article
- Fast and slow wave detection in bovine cancellous bone in vitro using bandlimited deconvolution and Prony's method.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014Article
- Time-domain separation of interfering waves in cancellous bone using bandlimited deconvolution: simulation and phantom study.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014Article
- Estimation of fast and slow wave properties in cancellous bone using Prony's method and curve fitting.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2013Article
- Effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on broadband ultrasonic attenuation for trabecular bone in vitro.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2011Article
- Determining attenuation properties of interfering fast and slow ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2011Article
- Inverse problems in cancellous bone: estimation of the ultrasonic properties of fast and slow waves using Bayesian probability theory.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2010Article
- Characterization of the trabecular bone structure using frequency modulated ultrasound pulse.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009Article
- Bone sonometry: reducing phase aberration to improve estimates of broadband ultrasonic attenuation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009Article
- Negative dispersion in bone: the role of interference in measurements of the apparent phase velocity of two temporally overlapping signals.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008Article
- The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of broadband ultrasound attenuation and backscatter coefficient in human calcaneus in vitro.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) is a clinically-accepted measurement for prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk. Typical clinical BUA measurements are performed with phase-sensitive receivers and, therefore, can be affected by phase cancellation. In order to separate the effects of conventional attenuation (absorption plus scattering) from phase cancellation, BUA was measured on phantoms with acrylic wedge phase aberrators and on 73 women using both phase sensitive (PS) and phase insensitive (PI) reception. A clinical bone sonometer with a two-dimensional (2-D) receiver array was used. PI BUA measurements on phantoms with acrylic wedge phase aberrators were found to be far more resistant to phase cancellation than PS BUA measurements. In data from 73 women, means and standard deviations for BUA measurements were 81.4 +/- 21.4 dB/MHz (PS) and 67.2 +/- 9.7 dB/MHz (PI). The magnitude of the discrepancy between PS BUA and PI BUA tended to increase with bone mineral density (BMD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.