ArticleScience and engineering ethics2007
A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Should we abandon regional anesthesia in open inguinal hernia repair in adults?European journal of medical research · 2015Pooled it
- Matters arising: a response to loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots.Npj mental health research · 2025Article
- A literature review of non-financial conflicts of interest in healthcare research and publication.BMC medical ethics · 2025Review
- Article
- Conflicts of Interest Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Investigating Interventions for Melanoma: Cross-sectional Literature Study.JMIR dermatology · 2021Article
- A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020Article
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.Experimental physiology · 2020Article
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Article
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research.BMJ open science · 2020Article
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Relationship Between Declarations of Conflict of Interests and Reporting Positive Outcomes in Iranian Dental Journals.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Review
- Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019Article
- Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017Article
- Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.Journal of Korean medical science · 2016Review
- Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey.BMJ open · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific journals can promote ethical publication practices through policies on conflicts of interest. However, the prevalence of conflict of interest policies and the definition of conflict of interest appear to vary across scientific disciplines. This survey of high-impact, peer-reviewed journals in 12 different scientific disciplines was conducted to assess these variations. The survey identified published conflict of interest policies in 28 of 84 journals (33%). However, when representatives of 49 of the 84 journals (58%) completed a Web-based survey about journal conflict of interest policies, 39 (80%) reported having such a policy. Frequency of policies (including those not published) varied by discipline, from 100% among general medical journals to none among physics journals. Financial interests were most frequently addressed with relation to authors; policies for reviewers most often addressed non-financial conflicts. Twenty-two of the 39 journals with policies (56%) had policies about editors' conflicts. The highest impact journals in each category were most likely to have a published policy, and the frequency of policies fell linearly with rank; for example, policies were published by 58% of journals ranked 1 in their category, 42% of journals ranked third, and 8% of journals ranked seventh (test for trend, p = 0.003). Having a conflict of interest policy was also associated with a self-reported history of problems with conflict of interest. The prevalence of published conflict of interest policies was higher than that reported in a 1997 study, an increase that might be attributable to heightened awareness of conflict of interest issues. However, many of the journals with policies do not make them readily available and many of those policies that were available lacked clear definitions of conflict of interest or details about how disclosures would be managed during peer review and publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17717729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.