Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17717453›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2007

Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients).

Hans-Christoph Pape, Dieter Rixen, John Morley, Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye, Michael Mueller, Clemens Dumont, Andreas Gruner, Hans Joerg Oestern, Michael Bayeff-Filoff, Christina Garving and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimal timing of stabilization and operative technique for extremity fractures in polytrauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Developments in the understanding of staging a "major fracture" in polytrauma: results from an initiative by the polytrauma section of ESTES.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hans-Christoph PapeDivision of Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. papehc@upmc.edu
Dieter Rixen
John Morley
Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye
Michael Mueller
Clemens Dumont
Andreas Gruner
Hans Joerg Oestern
Michael Bayeff-Filoff
Christina Garving
Dustin Pardini
Martijn van Griensven
Christian Krettek
Peter Giannoudis
EPOFF Study Group
St James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · USChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEKlinikum Braunschweig · DEOslo University Hospital · NOWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe timing of definitive fixation for major fractures in patients with multiple injuries is controversial. To address this gap, we randomized patients with blunt multiple injuries to either initial definitive stabilization of the femur shaft with an intramedullary nail or an external fixateur with later conversion to an intermedullary nail and documented the postoperative clinical condition.

methodsMultiply injured patients with femoral shaft fractures were randomized to either initial (<24 hours) intramedullary femoral nailing or external fixation and later conversion to an intramedullary nail. Inclusion: New Injury Severity Score >16 points, or 3 fractures and Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or =2 points and another injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or =2 points), and age 18 to 65 years. Exclusion: patients in unstable or critical condition. Patients were graded as stable or borderline (increased risk of systemic complications). OUTCOMES: : Incidence of acute lung injuries.

resultsTen European Centers, 165 patients, mean age 32.7 +/- 11.7 years. Group intramedullary nailing, n = 94; group external fixation, n = 71. Preoperatively, 121 patients were stable and 44 patients were in borderline condition. After adjusting for differences in initial injury severity between the 2 treatment groups, the odds of developing acute lung injury were 6.69 times greater in borderline patients who underwent intramedullary nailing in comparison with those who underwent external fixation, P < 0.05.

conclusionIntramedullary stabilization of the femur fracture can affect the outcome in patients with multiple injuries. In stable patients, primary femoral nailing is associated with shorter ventilation time. In borderline patients, it is associated with a higher incidence of lung dysfunctions when compared with those who underwent external fixation and later conversion to intermedullary nail. Therefore, the preoperative condition should be when deciding on the type of initial fixation to perform in patients with multiple blunt injuries.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaAdultChi-Square DistributionFemaleFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture HealingHumansMaleProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTrauma Severity IndicesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID17717453
PMCPMC1959352
OpenAlexW2042575430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.