Trial reportStroke2007
Clinical diagnosis of lacunar stroke in the first 6 hours after symptom onset: analysis of data from the glycine antagonist in neuroprotection (GAIN) Americas trial.
Trial report in Stroke, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- NMDA Receptor Mediated Mechanisms in the Post-Stroke Brain: From Physiology to Pathology.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Risk Factors for Silent Lacunar Infarction in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attack.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Article
- Explorative investigation of biomarkers of brain damage and coagulation system activation in clinical stroke differentiation.Journal of neurology · 2009Article
- Baseline NIH stroke scale responses estimate the probability of each particular stroke subtype.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeAlthough the pathophysiological heterogeneity of stroke may be highly relevant to the development of acute-phase therapies, discriminating between ischemic stroke subtypes soon after onset remains a challenge. We conducted a study of the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of lacunar stroke in the first 6 hours after symptom onset.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1367 patients in the Glycine Antagonist In Neuroprotection (GAIN) Americas trial. The Trial of ORG10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) category "small vessel (lacunar)" disease at day 7 or at hospital discharge was used as the reference standard to determine the accuracy of a diagnosis of a lacunar stroke made within 6 hours of symptom onset using the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification "LACS." Outcome was analyzed by comparing the proportions of patients classified as "LACS" at baseline or "small vessel (lacunar)" at 7 days who were dead or dependent at 3 months.
resultsThe positive predictive value of an OCSP diagnosis of a lacunar stroke was 76% (95% CI: 69% to 81%; sensitivity 64% [95% CI: 58% to 70%]; specificity 96% [95% CI: 95% to 97%]; negative predictive value 93% [95% CI: 92% to 94%]; accuracy 91% [95% CI: 89% to 92%]). The 3-month outcomes of patients classified as either OCSP "LACS" within 6 hours of onset or TOAST "small vessel (lacunar)" at 7 days were not significantly different.
conclusionsAn OCSP LACS diagnosis made within 6 hours of stroke onset is reasonably predictive of a final diagnosis of "small vessel (lacunar)" disease made using TOAST criteria and has a similar relationship to outcome at 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.