Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17714583›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007

Convergent algorithms for protein structural alignment.

Leandro Martínez, Roberto Andreani, José Mario Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preferential Solvation by Trifluoroethanol Drives α-Helical Folding in the Disordered S2 Region of the Escargot Protein.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Mapping the energy landscape of a fold-switching protein MAD2.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural and energetic analysis of stabilizing indel mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rosmarinic Acid Present inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of nematology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Antiviral Strategies Against SARS-CoV-2: A Systems Biology Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leandro MartínezInstitute of Chemistry, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. leandromartinez98@gmail.com
Roberto Andreani
José Mario Martínez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany algorithms exist for protein structural alignment, based on internal protein coordinates or on explicit superposition of the structures. These methods are usually successful for detecting structural similarities. However, current practical methods are seldom supported by convergence theories. In particular, although the goal of each algorithm is to maximize some scoring function, there is no practical method that theoretically guarantees score maximization. A practical algorithm with solid convergence properties would be useful for the refinement of protein folding maps, and for the development of new scores designed to be correlated with functional similarity.

resultsIn this work, the maximization of scoring functions in protein alignment is interpreted as a Low Order Value Optimization (LOVO) problem. The new interpretation provides a framework for the development of algorithms based on well established methods of continuous optimization. The resulting algorithms are convergent and increase the scoring functions at every iteration. The solutions obtained are critical points of the scoring functions. Two algorithms are introduced: One is based on the maximization of the scoring function with Dynamic Programming followed by the continuous maximization of the same score, with respect to the protein position, using a smooth Newtonian method. The second algorithm replaces the Dynamic Programming step by a fast procedure for computing the correspondence between C alpha atoms. The algorithms are shown to be very effective for the maximization of the STRUCTAL score.

conclusionThe interpretation of protein alignment as a LOVO problem provides a new theoretical framework for the development of convergent protein alignment algorithms. These algorithms are shown to be very reliable for the maximization of the STRUCTAL score, and other distance-dependent scores may be optimized with same strategy. The improved score optimization provided by these algorithms provide means for the refinement of protein fold maps and also for the development of scores designed to match biological function. The LOVO strategy may be also used for more general structural superposition problems such as flexible or non-sequential alignments. The package is available on-line at http://www.ime.unicamp.br/~martinez/lovoalign.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceMolecular Sequence DataProtein FoldingProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID17714583
PMCPMC1995224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.