ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2007
Lenalidomide in myeloma.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2008Review
- High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myeloma patients under the age of 65 years.Bone marrow transplantation · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard treatment approach to symptomatic myeloma consists of induction therapy, consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in appropriate patients, maintenance therapy, and salvage therapy. Salvage therapy is of particular importance because not all patients respond to primary therapy, and relapse is virtually universal in responding patients. Newer agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide are very active in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Their use singly and in combination results in excellent cytoreduction including complete remissions in patients relapsing - even after extensive prior therapy. These novel agents have been usually used as salvage therapy in patients relapsing after standard treatment options including transplantation; a setting in which they are thought to improve survival. However, there is an increasing trend to start using them early in the course of the disease; for induction therapy. While early deployment of these agents is certainly associated with high-response rates, evidence that this improves long-term outcome (survival) in patients who subsequently undergo intensive therapy and transplantation is lacking. Toxicity, expense, and possible long-term consequences on the biology of the disease (for example, development of refractory relapse) remain a concern. The most appropriate use of newer agents such as lenalidomide is as salvage therapy of relapsed or refractory disease, and their use as part of induction therapy should be confined to clinical trials until additional data and long-term follow-up are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17713723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.