ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Using electronic medical records to enhance detection and reporting of vaccine adverse events.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to promote adverse drug reaction reports using information systems - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- COVID-19 calls for health systems strengthening in Africa: A case of Nigeria.The International journal of health planning and management · 2021Article
- Using Electronic Medical Records to Identify Potentially Eligible Study Subjects for Lung Cancer Screening with Biomarkers.Cancers · 2021Article
- Applications of telemedicine in the supply and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines in Africa.Journal of global health · 2021Review
- Methods to Compare Adverse Events in Twitter to FAERS, Drug Information Databases, and Systematic Reviews: Proof of Concept with Adalimumab.Drug safety · 2018Article
- Review
- Advanced Clinical Decision Support for Vaccine Adverse Event Detection and Reporting.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015Article
- Review
- Awareness and utilization of reporting pathways for adverse events following immunization: online survey among pediatricians in Russia and Germany.Paediatric drugs · 2014Article
- Tools for measuring patient safety in primary care settings using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Military healthcare providers reporting of adverse events following immunizations to the vaccine adverse event reporting system.Military medicine · 2014Article
- Analysis of Relationship between Levofloxacin and Corrected QT Prolongation Using a Clinical Data Warehouse.Healthcare informatics research · 2011Article
- Emerging vaccine informatics.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010Review
- Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2008Article
- Text mining for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System: medical text classification using informative feature selection.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- The National Vaccine Advisory Committee: reducing patient and provider barriers to maternal immunizations: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on June 11, 2014.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We implemented an automated vaccine adverse event surveillance and reporting system based in an ambulatory electronic medical record to improve underreporting and incomplete reporting that prevails in spontaneous systems. This automated system flags potential vaccine adverse events for the clinician when a diagnosis is entered, prompts clinicians to consider the vaccine as a cause of the condition, and facilitates reporting of suspected adverse events to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). During five months, a total of 33,420 vaccinations were administered during 14,466 encounters. There were 5,914 follow-up contacts by vaccinees within 14 days of the vaccination visits; 686 (11.6%) generated an alert. Clinicians submitted VAERS reports for 23 of these (0.69 per 1,000 vaccine doses), which is almost 6 times the dose-based reporting rate to VAERS. (1) Clinician surveys indicated that it took a minimal amount of time to respond to the alerts. Of those who felt that an alert corresponded to an actual vaccine adverse event, the majority used the reporting feature to file a VAERS report. We believe that elicited surveillance via real time prompts to clinicians holds substantial promise. By coupling simplified reporting with the initial prompt, clinicians can consider and report a vaccine adverse event electronically in a few moments during the office visit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.