Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17710442›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2008

Safety and tolerability of velafermin (CG53135-05) in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant.

Michael W Schuster, Tsiporah B Shore, John G Harpel, June Greenberg, Bita Jalilizeinali, Scott Possley, Robert W Gerwien, William Hahne, Yuan-Di C Halvorsen

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of growth factors and cytokines for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review of cytokines and growth factors for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Radioprotection of normal tissue cells.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The FGF family: biology, pathophysiology and therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2009
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael W SchusterThe Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA. mwschust@med.cornell.edu
Tsiporah B Shore
John G Harpel
June Greenberg
Bita Jalilizeinali
Scott Possley
Robert W Gerwien
William Hahne
Yuan-Di C Halvorsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workThe objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of velafermin in patients at risk of developing severe oral mucositis (OM) from chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was a single-center, open-label, single-dose escalation, phase I trial in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). Velafermin was administered 24 h after stem cell infusion as a single intravenous dose infused over 15 min. Clinical safety variables were assessed and OM status scored daily for 30 days using the World Health Organization (WHO) grading scale. MAIN

resultsThirty patients were treated with velafermin at doses of 0.03 (n = 10), 0.1 (n = 10), 0.2 (n = 8), or 0.33 mg/kg (n = 2). Patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma (n = 16), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 12), acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 1), or desmoplasmic round cell tumor (n = 1). Velafermin was well tolerated at doses up to 0.2 mg/kg. There were no drug-related serious adverse events. No patient discontinued because of adverse events; however, two patients administered 0.33 mg/kg developed adverse reactions immediately after infusion of the study drug. No other patients were treated at this dose level. The most frequent (>35% of patients) treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, pyrexia, vomiting, and nausea. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved the same day without sequelae. Eight (27%) patients developed WHO grade 3 or 4 OM during the study; seven of these patients received high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen.

conclusionVelafermin was well tolerated by autologous PBSCT patients at doses up to 0.2 mg/kg.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFibroblast Growth FactorsHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationStomatitisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsFGF20 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.